Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Biosecurity Implementation in Italian Poultry Farms

Author:

Laconi Andrea1ORCID,Tilli Giuditta1ORCID,Galuppo Francesco2,Grilli Guido3ORCID,Souillard Rozenn4,Piccirillo Alessandra1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy

2. Unità Locale Socio-Sanitaria (ULSS) 6 Euganea, Via Enrico degli Scrovegni 14, 35131 Padua, Italy

3. Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Milan, Via dell’Università 6, 26900 Lodi, Italy

4. Epidemiology, Health and Welfare Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, 22440 Ploufragan, France

Abstract

The level of implementation of biosecurity measures (BMs), the reasons for not implementing BMs and the effectiveness of BMs were assessed according to the perceptions of stakeholders (i.e., farmers and advisors) in Italian poultry farms. For this purpose, data were collected using a questionnaire administered to advisors (n = 37) and farmers (n = 30) of conventional broiler (n = 13) and layer (n = 13), free-range broiler (n = 8) and layer (n = 10), turkey (n = 13), duck (n = 3) and breeder (n = 7) farms between April and September 2021. The frequency of the implementation of BMs was 66.97% and 81.14% according to the answers provided by the advisors and farmers, respectively, with the breeder sector showing the highest level of implementation (85.71%). “Not knowing advantages” (21.49% for advisors) and “other/specific reasons” (21.49% for advisors and 38.32% for farmers) were the most common answers regarding the lack of implementation of BMs for all poultry sectors. Only 31.09% of farmers acknowledged the effectiveness of not-implemented BMs in contrast to 61.02% of advisors, with the layers’ stakeholders being the most aware. The findings of this study may be useful for identifying failures in biosecurity and failures to develop intervention strategies to fulfil the biosecurity gaps still present in Italian poultry farms.

Funder

European Union

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology

Reference32 articles.

1. Role Played by the Environment in the Emergence and Spread of Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) through the Food Chain;Koutsoumanis;EFSA J.,2021

2. Approaches to Prevent and Control Campylobacter Spp. Colonization in Broiler Chickens: A Review;Shehata;Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.,2021

3. Modeling Salmonella Spread in Broiler Production: Identifying Determinants and Control Strategies;Machado;Front. Vet. Sci.,2020

4. One Biosecurity: A Unified Concept to Integrate Human, Animal, Plant, and Environmental Health;Hulme;Emerg. Top. Life Sci.,2021

5. Renault, V., Humblet, M.F., and Saegerman, C. (2022). Biosecurity Concept: Origins, Evolution and Perspectives. Animals, 12.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3