Abstract
Water resources are an important component of ecosystem services. During long periods of cloudiness and precipitation, when a ground-based sample is not available, the water bodies are detected from satellite SAR (synthetic-aperture radar) data using threshold methods (e.g., Otsu and Kittler–Illingworth). However, such methods do not enable to obtain the correct threshold value for the backscattering coefficient (σ0) of relatively small water areas in the image. The paper proposes and substantiates a method for the mapping of the surface of water bodies, which makes it possible to correctly identify water bodies, even in “water”/“land” class imbalance situations. The method operates on a principle of maximum compliance of the resulting SAR water mask with a given reference water mask. Therefore, the method enables the exploration of the possibilities of searching and choosing the optimal parameters (polarization and speckle filtering), which provide the maximum quality of SAR water mask. The method was applied for mapping natural and industrial water bodies in the Pohjois-Pohjanmaa region (North Ostrobothnia), Finland, using Sentinel-1A and -1B ground range detected (GRD) data (ascending and descending orbits) in 2018–2021. Reference water masks were generated based on optical spectral indices derived from Sentinel-2A and -2B data. The polarization and speckle filtering parameters were chosen since they provide the most accurate σ0 threshold (on average for all observations above 0.9 according to the Intersection over Union criterion) and are resistant to random fluctuations. If a reference water mask is available, the proposed method is more accurate than the Otsu method. Without a reference mask, the σ0 threshold is calculated as an average of thresholds obtained from previous observations. In this case, the proposed method is as good in accuracy as the Otsu method. It is shown that the proposed method enables the identification of surface water bodies under significant class imbalance conditions, such as when the water surface covers only a fraction of a percent of the area under study.
Funder
European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
Subject
Water Science and Technology,Aquatic Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Biochemistry
Reference81 articles.
1. Haines-Young, R., and Potschin, M. (2018). Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1, Fabis Consulting Ltd.. Technical Report.
2. Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management;Grizzetti;Environ. Sci. Policy,2016
3. Integrating Ecosystem Services Into Water Resource Management: An Indicator-Based Approach;Shaad;Environ. Manag.,2022
4. Owusu, S., Cofie, O., Mul, M., and Barron, J. (2022). The significance of small reservoirs in sustaining agricultural landscapes in dry areas of West Africa: A review. Water, 14.
5. Alahuhta, J., Joensuu, I., Matero, J., Vuori, K.M., and Saastamoinen, O. (2013). Freshwater Ecosystem Services in Finland, Finnish Environment Institute. Technical Report.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献