The 2017 Extreme Wildfires Events in Portugal through the Perceptions of Volunteer and Professional Firefighters
Author:
Leone Vittorio1, Elia Mario2ORCID, Lovreglio Raffaella3ORCID, Correia Fernando4, Tedim Fantina4ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Crop Systems, Forestry and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, Italy 2. Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences (DISSPA), University of Bari, 70199 Bari, Italy 3. Department of Agriculture, University of Sassari, 08100 Nuoro, Italy 4. Research Centre in Geography and Spatial Planning, CEGOT, Geography Department, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Porto, Via Panorâmica, 4150-564 Porto, Portugal
Abstract
This study aimed to explore differences in the perceptions of professional and voluntary firefighters regarding the extreme wildfire events that occurred in Portugal in 2017. We collected a sample of 185 participants, professional and voluntary firefighters, who directly participated in suppression activities for the Pedrógão Grande and October 2017 wildfires in Portugal. They were on duty in 149 fire stations in the Central Region of Portugal. A questionnaire was sent via Google Form to participants, based mainly on close-ended and two open-ended questions. It was structured into topics concerning the characteristics of wildfire events, the problems that occurred during the suppression activity, the emotional response of participants to the events, the lessons learned, and the consequences. We found significant differences between the two groups in their perception of wildfire characteristics and their perception of the worst fires they had ever experienced. Some differences were found in their discussion of the suppression phase and their emotional response to fires. On the contrary, the two groups appear to be homogeneous when it comes to no significant changes after the deadly 2017 experience in terms of the fight against rural fires, organization, training, prevention, and careers. The results underline the inadequacy of the suppression model vs. extreme wildfire events, and also its limits from the point of view of psychological reactions and the perception of management problems occurring in extreme and complex events. There is a research gap and no examples in Portugal about the perception of firefighters of the complex flow of activities that characterize the suppression operation of extreme wildfire events. Our research fills this gap.
Funder
Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Safety Research,Environmental Science (miscellaneous),Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Building and Construction,Forestry
Reference75 articles.
1. Tedim, F., Leone, V., Amraoui, M., Bouillon, C., Coughlan, M., Delogu, G., Fernandes, P., Ferreira, C., McCaffrey, S., and McGee, T. (2018). Defining Extreme Wildfire Events: Difficulties, Challenges, and Impacts. Fire, 1. 2. Casajus Valles, A., Marin Ferrer, M., Poljanšek, K., and Clark, I. (2020). Science for Disaster Risk Management 2020: Acting Today, Protecting Tomorrow, EUR 30183, Publications Office of the European Union. 3. Wildfires in Portugal;Viegas;Fire Res.,2018 4. Viegas, D. (2018). Advances in Forest Fire Research 2018, Chapter 3—Fire Management, University of Coimbra. 5. NOAA (2022, December 09). OPHELIA Graphics Archive: Initial Wind Field and Watch/Warning Graphic, Available online: https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2017/OPHELIA_graphics.php.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|