Assessment Method Integrating Visibility and Toxic Gas for Road Tunnel Fires Using 2D Maps for Identifying Risks in the Smoke Environment

Author:

Hsieh Huei-Ru1,Chung Hung-Chieh12ORCID,Kawabata Nobuyoshi3,Seike Miho4ORCID,Hasegawa Masato5,Chien Shen-Wen6ORCID,Shen Tzu-Sheng6

Affiliation:

1. Division of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa 9201164, Ishikawa, Japan

2. Fire Prevention Division, Kaohsiung City Fire Bureau, Kaohsiung City 80670, Taiwan

3. Faculty of Production Systems Engineering and Sciences, Komatsu University, Nu 1-3, Shicho-machi, Komatsu 9238511, Ishikawa, Japan

4. Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Transdisciplinary Science and Engineering Program, Hiroshima University, 1-5-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima 7398529, Hiroshima, Japan

5. Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Ishikawa College, Kitachujo, Tsubata 9290392, Ishikawa, Japan

6. Department of Fire Science, Central Police University, Taoyuan City 33304, Taiwan

Abstract

This study proposes an assessment method to quantify the risks of the smoke environment for road tunnel fire safety based on previous studies. The assessment method integrates visibility and toxic gases to address the hazards of smoke distribution more comprehensively. Considering that the hazards of visibility reduction and toxic gases for tunnel users vary with exposure time and location in a fire event, the smoke environment (SE) levels are defined as a function of longitudinal location and time. The SE levels simplify smoke distribution as calculated from 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFDs). For easily identifying SE risks, SE levels are illustrated on a 2D map to analyze the potential hazard by quantifying specific areas and times of smoke exposure. To demonstrate the applicability of the assessment method of this study, cases are carried out using CFD simulation to investigate the risks associated with tunnel fires with various tunnel cross-section types, longitudinal velocities, and gradients. In the analysis of the SE level in different cross-section types and longitudinal velocities under the condition of no vehicle, a velocity of 0.9–1.1 m/s can maintain a less serious SE level both upstream and downstream in a horizontal rectangular tunnel, and 0.3–0.5 m/s in a horizontal horseshoe-shaped tunnel. Both rectangular and horseshoe-shaped tunnels reveal an obvious rise within 10–15 min. In the case of inclined tunnels, for both rectangular and horseshoe-shaped tunnels, the SE level near the fire source obviously deteriorates. Thus, the longitudinal velocity range for the purpose of maintaining a relatively less serious SE level should be slightly reduced for inclined tunnels compared with horizontal tunnels.

Funder

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Safety Research,Environmental Science (miscellaneous),Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Building and Construction,Forestry

Reference51 articles.

1. European Parliament (2004). Directive 2004/54/EC on Minimum Safety Requirements for Tunnels in the Trans-European Road Network, European Commission.

2. Reviewing Italian Fire Safety Codes for the Analysis of Road Tunnel Evacuations: Advantages and Limitations of Using Evacuation Models;Ronchi;Saf. Sci.,2013

3. Evaluating the role of risk assessment for road tunnel fire safety: A comparative review within the EU;Ntzeremes;J. Traffic Transp. Eng. Engl. Ed.,2019

4. Kirytopoulos, K., Ntzeremes, P., and Kazaras, K. (2021). International Encyclopedia of Transportation, Elsevier.

5. Kohl, B., Botschek, K., and Hörhan, R. (2006, January 15–17). Austrian Risk Analysis for Road Tunnels Development of a new Method for the Risk Assessment of Road Tunnels. Proceedings of the Tunnel Safety and Ventilation—3rd International Conference, Graz, Austria. Available online: https://www.tunnel-graz.at/assets/files/tagungsbaende/Tunnel-Safety-and-Ventilation-GRAZ-03_2006.pdf.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3