Abstract
Maintaining the original trajectory of the root canal is a major challenge in endodontic therapy, especially in narrow and curved root canals. The present study aims to assess the shaping capacity of three endodontic systems made of different nickel–titanium alloys on simulated curved root canals. Thirty-six endodontic resin blocks (Ref. V040245, VDW) divided into three groups, each of twelve blocks (n = 12), were shaped, photographed, and analyzed: Group 1-Protaper Gold (PTG) (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) F2 25/08; Group 2-Reciproc Blue (RB), RB 25/08 (VDW, Munich, Germany); Group 3-WaveOne Gold (WOG) (Dentsply Maillefer), WOG 25/07. Each block was standardized and photographed before and after shaping in the same position, with the foramen oriented to the left. Post-shaping images were superimposed onto the initial ones. Thirteen measurement points were used for evaluation, spaced with 1 mm distance from one another, from level 0, apical foramen, to level 12, coronal orifice. The amount of removed resin from inner (X1) and outer (X2) walls, the direction of transportation (X1 − X2), and the centering ability (X1 − X2)/Y were measured, calculated, and comparatively analyzed. Statistical differences (p < 0.05) were observed between the shaping capacity of the considered systems in the middle and coronal thirds. PTG had a better centering ability than WOG and RB in the coronal third, while RB was more centered in the middle third in comparison to both WOG and PTG. In the apical third, the centering capacity of WOG was higher, without being statistically significant. WOG 25/07 and PTG 25/08 tend to cut more on the inner wall of the root canals, and RB 25/08 on the external one.
Subject
General Materials Science
Reference52 articles.
1. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means
2. Centering Ability and Influence of Experience When Using WaveOne Single-File Technique in Simulated Canals
3. Comparison of Shaping Ability of Five Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments in Simulated Curved Canals;Yufei;J. Dent. Oral Health,2017
4. Evaluation of the Canal Transportation and Centering Ratio at Different Levels of Simulated Curved Canals Prepared by OneShape, Protaper Next, Protaper Gold and TwoShape Nickel Titanium Rotary Files;Jasim;Int. J. Med. Res. Health Sci.,2019
5. Comparison of six files to prepare simulated root canals. Part 1