Quercus suber Allometry in the West Mediterranean Basin
Author:
Jorge Catarina1, Tomé Margarida1ORCID, Ruiz-Peinado Ricardo2ORCID, Zribi Lobna3, Paulo Joana Amaral1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Forest Research Centre, Associated Laboratory TERRA, School of Agriculture, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal 2. Instituto de Ciencias Forestales (ICIFOR-INIA), CSIC, Ctra. A Coruña km 7.5, 28040 Madrid, Spain 3. University of Lorraine, AgroParisTech, INRAE, UMR Silva, 54506 Nancy, France
Abstract
The necessity for accurate biomass estimates is greater than ever for the sustainable management of forest resources, which is an increasingly pressing matter due to climate change. The most used method to estimate biomass for operational purposes is through allometric equations. Typically, each country develops their own models to be applied at the local scale because it is more convenient. But, for Quercus suber, a joint regional model can be more beneficial, since the species is distributed across the Mediterranean and is challenging to account for due to felling limitations and the nature of mature cork biomass itself. We found that these characteristics are reflected in the biomass datasets and compatibility was, perhaps, the largest impediment to such a model. The use of dummy variables to differentiate between countries, as well as compromises in the limits of biomass compartments, allowed us to develop two joint models to estimate aboveground biomass in Portugal, Spain and Tunisia. One model as a function of diameter and another as a function of diameter and total tree height. In addition, we developed a separate model for roots (modelling efficiency of fitting = 0.89), since it was not possible to assure additivity of the whole tree. All coefficients were estimated using Seemingly Unrelated Regressions (SUR) and model fitting assured additivity in the aboveground compartments—leaves and woody biomass (modelling efficiency of fitting = 0.89 and 0.93, respectively). This work proves that it is possible to have a biologically sound and efficient model for the three countries, despite differences in the observed allometric patterns.
Funder
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia I.P.
Reference62 articles.
1. Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D.C., Tignor, M., Poloczanska, E.S., Mintenbeck, K., Alegría, A., Craig, M., Langsdorf, S., Löschke, S., and Möller, V. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, IPCC. 2. The Terrestrial Carbon Sink;Keenan;Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour.,2018 3. Santos, F.D., Ferreira, P.L., and Pedersen, J.S.T. (2022). The Climate Change Challenge: A Review of the Barriers and Solutions to Deliver a Paris Solution. Climate, 10. 4. Andersen, S.P., Allen, B., and Domingo, G.C. (2021). Biomass in the EU Green Deal: Towards Consensus on the Use of Biomass for EU Bioenergy, Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP). Policy Report. 5. Measuring Carbon in Forests: Current Status and Future Challenges;Brown;Environ. Pollut.,2002
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|