Rise and Fall of the Materiality Matrix: Lessons from a Missed Takeoff

Author:

De Cristofaro Tiziana,Raucci Domenico

Abstract

After a long period of the inclusion of materiality matrices within standard setters documents and non-financial reports, the Global Reporting Initiative officially abandoned the materiality matrix in 2021 after the GRI 3 standard release. To bridge the detected gaps in the literature, this article aims to investigate approaches to and arguments for the matrix until the issuance of GRI 3. The two-step research strategy adopted gives the same level of attention to the opposite positions found. Phase 1 (approach-oriented) reviews the materiality matrix presentation in the 2014–2020 non-financial reports of a sample of worldwide sustainability-oriented companies. Phase 2 (argument-oriented) performs qualitative content analysis on feedback for the GRI 3 preparatory works. The findings show that, besides the staunch adopters, a core of non-adopters persisted and prevented the takeoff of the matrix. Moreover, further insights into possible drivers both in favour of and against these approaches are provided. The final discussion both considers the lessons learnt, overlapping with policy implications, and suggests future research avenues.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference109 articles.

1. AccountAbility (2022, October 05). The Materiality Report. Aligning Strategy, Performance and Reporting. Available online: www.accountability.org/about-us/publications/materiality.html.

2. Adams, Carol A., Alhamood, Abdullah, He, Xinwu, Tian, Jie, Wang, Le, and Wang, Yi (2022, February 28). The Double-Materiality Concept. Application and Issues. Available online: https://dro.dur.ac.uk/33139/1/33139.pdf.

3. Nonfinancial reporting regulation and challenges in sustainability disclosure and corporate governance practices;Aureli;Business Strategy and the Environment,2020

4. Backof, Ann G., Negangard, Eric M., and Winchel, Jennifer (2022, June 18). CSR Restatements and the Contagion Effect: An Experimental Investigation of Issue Materiality and Intent. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3388115.

5. Bavagnoli, Francesco, Comoli, Maurizio, Gelmini, Lorenzo, and Riva, Patrizia (SSRN Electronic, 2014). An open question in the integrated reporting: Materiality or conciseness?, SSRN Electronic.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3