Bootstrapping of Corneal Optical Coherence Tomography Data to Investigate Conic Fit Robustness

Author:

Langenbucher Achim1,Szentmáry Nóra23,Cayless Alan4,Münninghoff Lena5,Wylegala Adam6ORCID,Wendelstein Jascha17ORCID,Hoffmann Peter5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, 66424 Homburg/Saar, Germany

2. Dr. Rolf M. Schwiete Center for Limbal Stem Cell and Aniridia Research, Saarland University, 66424 Homburg/Saar, Germany

3. Department of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, 1028 Budapest, Hungary

4. School of Physical Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK 6AA, UK

5. Augen- und Laserklinik Castrop-Rauxel, 44575 Castrop-Rauxel, Germany

6. Pathophysiology Department, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland

7. Department of Ophthalmology, Johannes Kepler University, 4021 Linz, Austria

Abstract

Background: Fitting of parametric model surfaces to corneal tomographic measurement data is required in order to extract characteristic surface parameters. The purpose of this study was to develop a method for evaluating the uncertainties in characteristic surface parameters using bootstrap techniques. Methods: We included 1684 measurements from a cataractous population performed with the tomographer Casia2. Both conoid and biconic surface models were fitted to the height data. The normalised fit error (height—reconstruction) was bootstrapped 100 times and added to the reconstructed height, extracting characteristic surface parameters (radii and asphericity for both cardinal meridians and axis of the flat meridian) for each bootstrap. The width of the 90% confidence interval of the 100 bootstraps was taken as uncertainty and quoted as a measure of the robustness of the surface fit. Results: As derived from bootstrapping, the mean uncertainty for the radii of curvature was 3 µm/7 µm for the conoid and 2.5 µm/3 µm for the biconic model for the corneal front/back surface, respectively. The corresponding uncertainties for the asphericity were 0.008/0.014 for the conoid and 0.001/0.001 for the biconic. The respective mean root mean squared fit error was systematically lower for the corneal front surface as compared to the back surface (1.4 µm/2.4 µm for the conoid and 1.4 µm/2.6 µm for the biconic). Conclusion: Bootstrapping techniques can be applied to extract uncertainties of characteristic model parameters and yield an estimate for robustness as an alternative to evaluating repeat measurements. Further studies are required to investigate whether bootstrap uncertainties accurately reproduce those from repeat measurement analysis.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3