Using Ground- and Drone-Based Surface Emission Monitoring (SEM) Data to Locate and Infer Landfill Methane Emissions

Author:

Abichou Tarek1,Bel Hadj Ali Nizar2ORCID,Amankwah Sakina1,Green Roger3,Howarth Eric S.4

Affiliation:

1. FAMU-FSU College of Engineering, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA

2. Ecole Nationale d’Ingénieurs de Gabès, University of Gabès, Gabes 6029, Tunisia

3. Waste Management, Hoston, TX 77002, USA

4. Technical Field Support, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA

Abstract

Ground- and drone-based surface emission monitoring (SEM) campaigns were performed at two municipal solid waste landfills, during the same week as mobile tracer correlation method (TCM) testing was used to measure the total methane emissions from the same landfills. The G-SEM and the D-SEM data, along with wind data, were used as input into an inverse modeling approach combined with an optimization-based methane emission estimation method (implemented in a tool called SEM2Flux). This approach involves the use of backward dispersion modeling to estimate the whole-site methane emissions from a given landfill and the identification of locations and emission rates of major leaks. SEM2Flux is designed to exploit the measured surface methane concentration concurrently with wind data and tackle two problems: (1) inferring the estimates of methane rates from individual landfills, and (2) identifying the likely locations of the main emission sources. SEM2Flux results were also compared with emission estimates obtained using TCM. In Landfill B, the average TCM-measured methane emissions was 1178 Kg/h, with a standard deviation of 271 Kg/h. In Landfill C, the average TCM-measured emission rate was 601 Kg/h, with a standard deviation of 292 Kg/h. For both landfills, the D-SEM data yielded statistically similar estimates of methane emissions as the TCM-measured emissions. On the other hand, the G-SEM data yielded comparable estimates of emissions to TCM-measured emissions only for Landfill C, where the D-SEM and G-SEM data were statistically not different. The results of this study showcase the ability of this method using surface concentrations to provide a rapid and simple estimation of fugitive methane emissions from landfills. Such an approach can also be used to assess the effectiveness of different remedial actions in reducing fugitive methane emissions from a given landfill.

Funder

Environmental and Research

Education Foundation and Hinkley Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference17 articles.

1. Montzka, S., and The NOAA Annual Greenhouse Gas Index (AGGI) (2023, June 10). NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory Website, Available online: https://gml.noaa.gov/aggi/aggi.html.

2. EPA (2023). U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2021.

3. Methodologies for measuring fugitive methane emissions from landfills—A review;Kjeldsen;Waste Manag.,2019

4. Sullivan, P.S., and Huff, R.H. (2022, January 27–30). The Evolution of Methane Emissions Measurements at Landfills: Where are We Now?. Proceedings of the A&WMA’s 115th Annual Conference & Exhibition, San Francisco, CA, USA.

5. Quantification of methane emissions in a Mediterranean landfill (Southern Spain). A combination of flux chambers and geostatistical methods;Waste Manag.,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3