Abstract
In a time when the minimalist emptiness of many contemporary church buildings rightly encounters criticism for its incapacity to create a sacred atmosphere, it is good to plead again for sacred emptiness as a religious symbol in its own right. Because this term concerns the apophatic dimension of religion and the importance of mystery and transcendence in daily life, it is not just an important question for architects but for anybody who considers the meaning of religion today. This article recovers first the insights of two thinkers of the twentieth century who pleaded for sacred emptiness, the Protestant theologian Paul Tillich and the Roman Catholic architect Rudolf Schwarz, before examining the fruitfulness of sacred emptiness for church architecture today. The conclusions of this research will be that their approaches are complementary and that their plea for sacred emptiness has gained importance today but must be answered in a new way. Some contemporary case studies of sacred space by renowned architects demonstrate the importance of sacred emptiness. At first, it is still anonymous, but gradually, through the mystagogical interaction with visitors and users, sacred emptiness gains more definite meaning.
Reference54 articles.
1. The Sacred In-Between: The Mediating Roles of Architecture;Barrie,2010
2. Beyond Beige Churches: Modernity and Liturgical Architecture;Barron;Antiphon,2001
3. When Bricks Matter: Four Arguments for the Sociological Study of Religious Buildings
4. God and Enchantment of Place: Reclaiming Human Experience;Brown,2004
5. Constructing the Ineffable: Contemporary Sacred Architecture;Cavarra Britton,2010
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献