Bicycle Infrastructure Design Principles in Urban Bikeability Indices: A Systematic Review

Author:

Ahmed Tufail1ORCID,Pirdavani Ali12ORCID,Wets Geert1,Janssens Davy1

Affiliation:

1. UHasselt, The Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), Martelarenlaan 42, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium

2. UHasselt, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Agoralaan, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium

Abstract

Bicycling is a sustainable form of micromobility and offers numerous health and environmental benefits. Scientific studies investigating bikeability have grown substantially, especially over the past decade. This paper presents a systematic literature review of the developed urban bikeability indices (BIs). The paper provides insight into the scientific literature on bikeability as a tool to measure bicycle environment friendliness; more importantly, the paper seeks to know if the BIs consider bicycle infrastructure design principles. Data extraction included identifying the geographical location, essential indicators, sample size and distribution, data source, the unit of analysis, measurement scale, methods used to weigh indicators, and identification of studies using bicycle design principles in BIs. The database search yielded 1649 research articles using different keywords and combinations, while 15 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. The studies were found to be conducted in various geographical locations. The unit of analysis for developing the index varied across studies, from street segments or bicycle lanes to zones within the city or even the entire city. The most commonly utilized method in developing urban BIs was a scoring and weighting system to weigh the indicators. The weighting methods include an equal weight system, survey-based and literature review-based methods, expert surveys, the analytic hierarchy process, and a weighted linear combination model. The essential criterion is bicycle infrastructure, such as bike lanes, routes, and bicycle paths as 14 studies considered it for the construction of the BIs. The review findings suggest a lack of consideration of all five bicycle infrastructure design principles, as only three studies considered them all, while others only included a subset. Safety and comfort are the most commonly considered principles, while coherence is the least considered principles in the BIs. It is crucial to consider all five bicycle infrastructure design principles to create a bicycle-friendly environment and attract more people to this sustainable mode of transportation.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference76 articles.

1. Kazemzadeh, K., Laureshyn, A., Hiselius, L.W., and Ronchi, E. (2020). Expanding the Scope of the Bicycle Level-of-Service Concept: A Review of the Literature. Sustainability, 12.

2. Ahmed, T., Pirdavani, A., Janssens, D., and Wets, G. (2023). Utilizing Intelligent Portable Bicycle Lights to Assess Urban Bicycle Infrastructure Surfaces. Sustainability, 15.

3. The Impact of e-Cycling on Travel Behaviour: A Scoping Review;Bourne;J. Transp. Health,2020

4. Investigating Bicyclists’ Perception of Comfort on Physically Separated Bicycle Paths in Nanjing, China;Li;Transp. Res. Rec.,2012

5. Manum, B., Nordström, T., Arnesen, P., Cooper, C., Gil, J., Dahl, E., Chan, R., Rokseth, L., and Green, S. (2019, January 8–13). Using Realistic Travel-Time Thresholds in Accessibility Measures of Bicycle Route Networks. Proceedings of the 12th International Space Syntax Symposium, Beijing, China.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3