Facilitators and Barriers to Online Teaching and Educational Technology Use by University Lecturers during COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence

Author:

Kaqinari Tomas1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Educational Sciences, University of Basel, 4132 Muttenz, Switzerland

Abstract

This systematic review of qualitative evidence contributes to the understanding of individual factors that influenced Emergency Remote Teaching and the use of educational technology by lecturers during the COVID-19 pandemic. A coding scheme aimed at identifying these key factors was developed using a comprehensive theoretical framework based on the model of triadic reciprocity. A narrative synthesis of 49 studies revealed that lecturers had unique starting points for the transition, which were influenced by factors such as prior experience with educational technology and online teaching, their attitudes and beliefs towards it, and their technological knowledge. Despite varying levels of preparedness and different attitudes, lecturers were able to leverage their pedagogical knowledge, adaptability, and motivation to continue education under extraordinary circumstances. On the other hand, a lack of experience in educational technology integration, negative attitudes and beliefs towards it, and insufficient technological knowledge hindered the transition to Emergency Remote Teaching. Lecturers therefore actively sought out appropriate educational technologies that would cater to their needs and those of their students. The initial autodidactic effort required that lecturers learn new technologies, along with how to effectively use them for teaching. A significant proportion of the use of educational technology was aimed at augmenting conventional teaching practices and providing students with an interactive learning environment, in terms of social embeddedness and personalized learning pathways. However, many lecturers attempted to replicate the pre-pandemic classroom in an online setting by substituting conventional teaching practices in an online classroom. This systematic review suggests the need to implement institutional onboarding measures for lecturers to level the “unique starting points” to ensure technology-enhanced learning in emergencies. This can be achieved by equipping lecturers with digital competence and pedagogical knowledge and by fostering self-efficacy, thus preparing them for future scenarios that require rapid adaptation and for digital transformation in general.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference119 articles.

1. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., and Bond, A. (2022, April 29). The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. Available online: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning.

2. Curaj, A., Matei, L., Pricopie, R., Salmi, J., and Scott, P. (2015). The European Higher Education Area: Between Critical Reflections and Future Policies, Springer.

3. Technology—Mediated Learning Theory;Bower;Br. J. Educ. Technol.,2019

4. Factors Affecting Faculty Use of Learning Technologies: Implications for Models of Technology Adoption;Buchanan;J. Comput. High Educ.,2013

5. The Switch to Online Teaching During the First COVID-19 Lockdown: A Comparative Study at Four European Universities;Kaqinari;J. Univ. Teach. Learn. Pract.,2021

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3