Abstract
While journal articles are still considered the most important sources of scholarly reading, libraries may no longer have a monopoly on providing discovery and access. Many other sources of scholarly information are available to readers. This international study examines how researchers discover, read, and use scholarly literature for their work. Respondents in 2018 report an average of almost 20 article readings a month and there are still significant differences found in the reading and use of scholarly literature by discipline and geographical location, consistent with the earlier studies. Researchers show they are willing to change or adopt new strategies to discover and obtain articles.
Funder
Engineering Information Foundation
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Media Technology,Communication,Business and International Management,Library and Information Sciences
Reference39 articles.
1. The STM Report: An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Journal Publishinghttps://www.stm-assoc.org/2015_02_20_STM_Report_2015.pdf
2. STM: International Association of Scientifics, Technical and Medical Publishers;Johnson,2018
3. Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians, and Publishers;Tenopir,2000
4. Scholarly article seeking, reading, and use: a continuing evolution from print to electronic in the sciences and social sciences
5. Communication and information processing within scientific disciplines: Empirical findings for Psychology
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献