Author:
Hladik Dirk,Fraunholz Christoph,Kühnbach Matthias,Manz Pia,Kunze Robert
Abstract
In Germany, the political decision to phase out nuclear and coal-fired power as well as delays in the planned grid extension are expected to intensify the current issue of high grid congestion volumes. In this article, we investigate two instruments which may help to cope with these challenges: market splitting and the introduction of a capacity mechanism. For this purpose, we carry out a comprehensive system analysis by jointly applying the demand side models FORECAST and eLOAD, the electricity market model PowerACE and the optimal power flow model ELMOD. While a German market splitting has a positive short-term impact on the congestion volumes, we find the optimal zonal delimination determined for 2020 to become outdated by 2035 resulting in new grid bottlenecks. Yet, readjusting the zonal configuration would lower the ability of the market split to provide regional investment incentives. Introducing a capacity mechanism with a congestion indicator allows allocating new power plants in regions with higher electricity demand. Consequently, we find the required congestion management to be substantially reduced in this setting. However, given the large amount of design parameters, any capacity mechanism needs to be carefully planned before its introduction to avoid new inefficiences on the market side.
Subject
Energy (miscellaneous),Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Optimization,Engineering (miscellaneous)
Reference49 articles.
1. From Nodal to Zonal Pricing—A Bottom-Up Approach to the Second-Best;Burstedde,2012
2. Optimized bidding area delimitations and their impact on electricity markets and congestion management
3. Market splitting in Germany – New evidence from a three-stage numerical model of Europe
4. Bedeutung von Etablierten Nationalen Gebotszonen für die Integration des Europäischen Strommarktes—Ein Ansatz zur Wohlfahrtsorientierten Beurteilung—Ein Bericht für die Bundesnetzagentur,2011
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献