A Study on the Compatibility of a Food-Recording Application with Questionnaire-Based Methods in Healthy Japanese Individuals

Author:

Iizuka Katsumi1ORCID,Deguchi Kanako1,Ushiroda Chihiro1ORCID,Yanagi Kotone2,Seino Yusuke3ORCID,Suzuki Atsushi3ORCID,Yabe Daisuke45ORCID,Sasaki Hitomi6,Sasaki Satoshi7,Saitoh Eiichi8,Naruse Hiroyuki29

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Nutrition, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan

2. Health Management Center, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan

3. Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan

4. Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism and Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Nutrition, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 501-1194, Japan

5. Center for One Medicine Innovative Translational Research, Gifu University, Gifu 501-1194, Japan

6. International Medical Center, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan

7. Department of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan

8. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine I, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan

9. Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Fujita Health University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan

Abstract

In Japan, nutritional guidance based on food-recording apps and food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) is becoming popular. However, it is not always recognized that different dietary assessment methods have different nutritional values. Here, we compared the compatibility of dietary intake data obtained from an app with those obtained from FFQs in 59 healthy individuals who recorded information regarding their diet for at least 7 days per month using an app developed by Asken (Tokyo, Japan). The diurnal coefficient of variation in total energy and protein intake was 20%, but those for vitamins B12 and D were >80%, reflecting the importance of 7 days of recording rather than a single day of recording for dietary intake analyses. Then, we compared the results of two FFQs—one based on food groups and one based on a brief self-administered diet history questionnaire—for 7 days, as recorded by the app. There was a correlation coefficient of >0.4 for all the items except salt. Regarding the compatibility between the app and FFQs, the percentage errors for total energy and nutrients were >40–50%, suggesting no agreement between the app and the two FFQs. In conclusion, careful attention should be paid to the impact of different dietary assessment methods on nutrient assessment.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3