Affiliation:
1. National Wildlife Research Center, USDA APHIS Wildlife Services, 6100 Columbus Avenue, Sandusky, OH 43452, USA
2. USDA APHIS Wildlife Services, 4700 River Road, 2D-03A, Riverdale, MD 20737, USA
Abstract
Prescribed burning is a management tool commonly used in forested ecosystems in the southeastern United States, but the influence of this method on grassland vegetation and wildlife in this geographic region is unknown. During 2009–2015, we conducted a study to determine if the application of prescribed burning and/or long-term biosolid applications alter plant communities and/or wildlife use of grassland areas at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, Havelock, NC. We monitored vegetation growth, measured plant community composition, and documented wildlife activity in four study plots for 3 years after the implementation of annual winter prescribed burns. Prescribed burning reduced the amount of litter, increased bare ground during spring, and altered the plant community composition relative to areas that were not burned. Overall, prescribed burning did not alter (F1,803 = 0.37, p = 0.54) bird use of the airfield grasslands, while the long-term application of biosolids resulted in higher (F1,803 = 17.61, p < 0.01) bird use. Few species-specific differences in avian use of prescribed burned and unburned grasslands were found. In contrast, white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) use of areas that were burned in winter, as well as the adjacent unburned areas, was drastically reduced. Winter prescribed burning appeared to remove forage plants at the time of year deer would use them the most. Our findings suggest that prescribed burning and biosolid applications, used alone and in combination, might be viable grassland management tools for altering wildlife use of grassland areas, specifically white-tailed deer; however, similar research at additional locations should be conducted.
Funder
U.S. Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point
intramural research program of the U.S. Department of Agriculture
Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services
Reference51 articles.
1. Fire regimens for pine-grassland communities in the southeastern United States;Waldrop;For. Ecol. Manag.,1992
2. Vegetation dynamics after a prescribed fire in the southern Appalachians;Elliott;For. Ecol. Manag.,1999
3. Ford, W.M., Russell, K.R., and Moorman, C.E. (2000). The historical foundation of prescribed burning for wildlife: A southeastern perspective, The Role of Fire in Nongame Wildlife Management and Community Restoration: Traditional Uses and New Directions, General Technical Report NE-288.
4. Ford, W.M., Russell, K.R., and Moorman, C.E. (2000). Fire in the eastern United States: Influence on wildlife habitat, The Role of Fire in Nongame Wildlife Management and Community Restoration: Traditional Uses and New Directions, General Technical Report NE-288.
5. Effects of prescribed fire on deer forage and nutrients;Wood;Wildl. Soc. Bull.,1998