Abstract
This study develops and empirically validates a multidimensional scale for measuring mediator acceptability (MEDACCEPT) from a sustainable trading perspective. Moreover, it examines the developed scales’ ability to evaluate the impact of mediator selection. Data are collected from a professional research firm using 265 respondents who have mediation experience in export or import industrial areas. Although we initially identify seven dimensions, the research findings empirically identify the following five primary dimensions that drive mediator acceptability: status, legal expertise, procedural justice, restorative justice, and perceived confidentiality. Interestingly, while traditional mediation literature highlights the importance of a mediator’s skill and cultural expertise, our scales exclude these two constructs. The MEDACCEPT scales are salient only to firms that trade physical products, suggesting further research directions.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference35 articles.
1. A study on the resolution of trade disputes by mediation;Jang;Korea Trade Rev.,2018
2. Dispute Resolution Negotiation, Mediation, Arbitration, and Other Processes;Goldberg,2012
3. Conciliation of environment related trade dispute;Kim;Korea Trade Rev.,2002
4. Culture in the Mediation of International Disputes
5. Arbitrator acceptability in international commercial arbitration
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Home Office—Benefit for Employer or Employee?;Studies in Systems, Decision and Control;2023