Sustainability across the Medical Device Lifecycle: A Scoping Review
-
Published:2024-02-08
Issue:4
Volume:16
Page:1433
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Montesinos Luis1ORCID, Checa Rifá Pedro2ORCID, Rifá Fabregat Mireya3ORCID, Maldonado-Romo Javier1ORCID, Capacci Stefano4, Maccaro Alessia2ORCID, Piaggio Davide2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Advanced Materials for Sustainable Manufacturing, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico City 14380, Mexico 2. School of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK 3. European Network of Safety and Health Professional Organizations, Bracheweg 11, 23569 Lübeck, Germany 4. Longevity Partners, 5th Floor, One, St. Paul’s Churchyard, London EC4M 8AP, UK
Abstract
Medical devices are instrumental in servicing the healthcare sector and promoting well-being in modern societies. However, their production and use contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions, thus causing indirect harm to global health. With a share of approximately 4.4% of global emissions, the healthcare sector exhales CO2 throughout its value chain; sources of this range from direct electricity consumption and water heating in healthcare facilities to the supply chains delivering healthcare services and products. Within this context, the environmental impact of medical devices is present across their production, distribution, usage, and eventual disposal. Each step in the lifecycle of medical devices consumes energy and natural resources, and the end product, after its often single use, is discarded, generating plastic or electronic waste. This study aims to present the key findings from a scoping review of academic research on the topic, which focuses on reducing the environmental impact of medical devices and equipment. The review, conducted according to the PRISMA checklist for scoping reviews, examined 41 studies and categorised them based on the lifecycle stages of medical devices (design and development, manufacturing, usage, and end of life) and the sustainability aspects (economic, environmental, and social) discussed by the authors. The findings suggest that while efforts have been made to enhance economic and environmental sustainability throughout the design, development, and usage of medical devices, there is still room for improvement in mitigating their ecological impact at the end of their lifecycle and maximising their social impact by design.
Funder
Health Global Research Priorities Innovative Manufacturing and Future Materials GRP of the University of Warwick EPSRC Impact Accelerator Award School of Engineering, University of Warwick
Reference86 articles.
1. Lackner, M., Sajjadi, B., and Chen, W.-Y. (2022). Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation, Springer International Publishing. 2. The Paris Agreement: A New Beginning?;Savaresi;J. Energy Nat. Resour. Law,2016 3. Smil, V. (2017). Energy and Civilization: A History, The MIT Press. 4. Della Vigna, M., Stavrinou, Z., Bhandari, N., and Neil, M. (2019). Brian Singer Carbonomics the Future of Energy in the Age of Climate Change, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 5. Economics for the future—Beyond the superorganism;Hagens;Ecol. Econ.,2020
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|