Affiliation:
1. Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
Abstract
Private financing mobilized in the water supply and sanitation sector has not been sufficient to cover the sector’s needs. Several barriers hinder private financing leveraging, including the risk perception of water supply and sanitation projects. This study analyzed 185 water supply and sanitation projects financed by the World Bank between 2015 and 2021 to understand how perceived project risks can influence the financing of these sectors. This study demonstrates the parallels between different types of project risks, their ratings, and the different lending instruments and amounts committed by the bank. The most prevalent risks in the analyzed WSS projects were identified, namely, fiduciary, institutional capacity for implementation and sustainability, environmental and social, and political and governance. The World Bank appears to have different levels of tolerance for the different types of risks, and this tolerance seems to vary between regions and with time. Risks seem to have different weights when financiers decide which WSS projects to finance. Global and regional risk profiles of the 185 WSS projects financed by the World Bank were developed, which can help borrowers identify risks that they can mitigate to potentially improve their ability to attract private finance for WSS projects.
Subject
Water Science and Technology,Aquatic Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Biochemistry
Reference54 articles.
1. Pories, L., Fonseca, C., and Delmon, V. (2019). Mobilising finance for WASH: Getting the foundations right. Water, 11.
2. OECD (2019). Making Blended Finance Work for Water and Sanitation: Unlocking Commercial Finance for SDG6, OECD. OECD Studies on Water.
3. Machete, I., and Marques, R. (2021). Financing the water and sanitation sectors: A hybrid literature review. Infrastructures, 6.
4. Rees, J.A., Winpenny, J., and Wall, A.W. (2008). Water Financing and Governance, Global Water Partnership/Swedish International Development Agency. TEC Background Papers No. 12.
5. Barriers to the implementation of innovative financing (IF) of infrastructure;Badu;J. Financ. Manag. Prop. Constr.,2012
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献