Establishing a Model for the User Acceptance of Cybersecurity Training

Author:

Fallatah Wesam1ORCID,Kävrestad Joakim2ORCID,Furnell Steven1

Affiliation:

1. School of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK

2. School of Engineering, Jönköping University, 551 11 Jönköping, Sweden

Abstract

Cybersecurity is established as fundamental for organisations and individuals engaging with digital technology. A central topic in cybersecurity is user behaviour, which has been shown to be the root cause or enabler in a majority of all cyber incidents with a resultant need to empower users to adopt secure behaviour. Researchers and practitioners agree that a crucial step in empowering users to adopt secure behaviour is training. Subsequently, there are many different methods for cybersecurity training discussed in the scientific literature and that are adopted in practise. However, research suggests that those training efforts are not effective enough, and one commonly mentioned reason is user adoption problems. In essence, users are not engaging with the provided training to the extent needed to benefit from the training as expected. While the perception and adoption of individual training methods are discussed in the scientific literature, cohesive studies on the factors that impact user adoption are few and far between. To that end, this paper focuses on the user acceptance of cybersecurity training using the technology acceptance model as a theory base. Based on 22 included publications, the research provides an overview of the cybersecurity training acceptance factors that have been discussed in the existing scientific literature. The main contributions are a cohesive compilation of existing knowledge about factors that impact the user acceptance of cybersecurity training and the introduction of the CTAM, a cybersecurity training acceptance model which pinpoints four factors—regulatory control, worry, apathy, and trust—that influence users’ intention to adopt cybersecurity training. The results can be used to guide future research as well as to guide practitioners implementing cybersecurity training.

Funder

Lars Hierta Memorial Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference32 articles.

1. Davis, F.D. (1985). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

2. The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future;Lee;Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst.,2003

3. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies;Venkatesh;Manag. Sci.,2000

4. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions;Venkatesh;Decis. Sci.,2008

5. Paré, G., and Kitsiou, S. (2017). Methods for literature reviews. Handbook of Ehealth Evaluation: An Evidence-Based Approach [Internet], University of Victoria.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3