Affiliation:
1. Institute on the Biology of Aging and Metabolism, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
2. Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
3. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
Abstract
Increasing stochasticity is a key feature in the aging process. At the molecular level, in addition to genome instability, a well-recognized hallmark of aging, cell-to-cell variation in gene expression was first identified in mouse hearts. With the technological breakthrough in single-cell RNA sequencing, most studies performed in recent years have demonstrated a positive correlation between cell-to-cell variation and age in human pancreatic cells, as well as mouse lymphocytes, lung cells, and muscle stem cells during senescence in vitro. This phenomenon is known as the “transcriptional noise” of aging. In addition to the increasing evidence in experimental observations, progress also has been made to better define transcriptional noise. Traditionally, transcriptional noise is measured using simple statistical measurements, such as the coefficient of variation, Fano factor, and correlation coefficient. Recently, multiple novel methods have been proposed, e.g., global coordination level analysis, to define transcriptional noise based on network analysis of gene-to-gene coordination. However, remaining challenges include a limited number of wet-lab observations, technical noise in single-cell RNA sequencing, and the lack of a standard and/or optimal data analytical measurement of transcriptional noise. Here, we review the recent technological progress, current knowledge, and challenges to better understand transcriptional noise in aging.
Funder
NIH
American Federation for Aging Research
Subject
Inorganic Chemistry,Organic Chemistry,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Computer Science Applications,Spectroscopy,Molecular Biology,General Medicine,Catalysis
Reference55 articles.
1. Understanding the odd science of aging;Kirkwood;Cell,2005
2. US Cancer Statistics Working Group (2013). United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2010 Incidence and Mortality Web-Based Report.
3. Aging, frailty and age-related diseases;Fulop;Biogerontology,2010
4. Ageing as a risk factor for disease;Niccoli;Curr. Biol.,2012
5. The aging process: Major risk factor for disease and death;Harman;Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,1991