Affiliation:
1. College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Abstract
Background: Amblyopia is associated with unbalanced suppression between the two eyes. Existing clinical measures of suppression, such as the Worth 4 Dot test, provide qualitative information about suppression but cannot precisely quantify it. The Synoptophore, a well-established instrument in binocular vision clinics, has historically been used to gauge suppression qualitatively as well but has the capability to quantify suppression. We extended the capability of the Synoptophore through the development of a systematic protocol of illumination manipulation to quantify suppression in amblyopia. Methods: Twenty-six previously treated adult amblyopes underwent our protocol on the Synoptophore to measure the illumination balance needed to obtain fusion responses. Separately, these same amblyopes were tested with Worth 4 Dot as it is classically performed in the United States, utilizing different test distances and room illuminations to qualify the suppression response. Results: Smaller, more central targets revealed larger magnitudes of suppression for both the Synoptophore and Worth 4 Dot tests (Synoptophore: χ25,26 = 25.538, p < 0.001; Worth 4 Dot: χ23,26 = 39.020, p < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between the two tests for depth of suppression measurements (rΤ > 0.345, p < 0.036), with more sensitivity measured by the Synoptophore, as suppression could be graded on a quantitative scale. Strabismic amblyopes demonstrated more suppression than non-strabismic amblyopes (z > 2.410, p < 0.016). Additionally, depth of suppression was correlated with interocular difference in both visual acuity (rΤ = 0.604, p < 0.001) and stereoacuity (rΤ = 0.488, p = 0.001). Conclusions: We extended the utility of the Synoptophore by measuring its illuminance outputs and developing a suppression testing protocol that compared favorably with Worth 4 Dot (clinic standard) while improving upon the latter through more sensitive quantification of suppression.
Funder
National Eye Institute
Ohio Lions Eye Research Foundation
Beta Sigma Kappa—College of Optometrists in Vision Development
Subject
Paleontology,Space and Planetary Science,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference37 articles.
1. Von Noorden, G.K., and Campos, E.C. (2002). Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility: Theory and Management of Strabismus, Mosby.
2. Prevalence of amblyopia or strabismus in asian and non-Hispanic white preschool children: Multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study;Cotter;Ophthalmology,2013
3. Ciuffreda, K.J., Levi, D.M., and Selenow, A. (1991). Amblyopia: Basic and Clinical Aspects, Butterworth-Heinemann.
4. Stereopsis and amblyopia: A mini-review;Levi;Vis. Res.,2015
5. Visual processing in amblyopia: Animal studies;Kiorpes;Strabismus,2006