Comparative Analysis of QCM and Electrochemical Aptasensors for SARS-CoV-2 Detection
-
Published:2024-09-06
Issue:9
Volume:14
Page:431
-
ISSN:2079-6374
-
Container-title:Biosensors
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biosensors
Author:
Nemčeková Katarína12ORCID, Korčeková Jana3, Svitková Veronika12ORCID, Baraniak Denis2, Domšicová Michaela3ORCID, Melníková Eva1, Hornychová Michaela1, Szebellaiová Viktória1, Gál Miroslav1ORCID, Poturnayová Alexandra3
Affiliation:
1. Department of Inorganic Technology, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, 812 37 Bratislava, Slovakia 2. Institute of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, 812 37 Bratislava, Slovakia 3. Center of Biosciences, Institute of Molecular Physiology and Genetics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 840 05 Bratislava, Slovakia
Abstract
The rapid and accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2, particularly its spike receptor-binding domain (S-RBD), was crucial for managing the COVID-19 pandemic. This study presents the development and optimization of two types of aptasensors: quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) and electrochemical sensors, both employing thiol-modified DNA aptamers for S-RBD detection. The QCM aptasensor demonstrated exceptional sensitivity, achieved by optimizing aptamer concentration, buffer composition, and pre-treatment conditions, with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.07 pg/mL and a linear range from 1 pg/mL to 0.1 µg/mL, and a significant frequency change was observed upon target binding. The electrochemical aptasensor, designed for rapid and efficient preparation, utilized a one-step modification process that reduced the preparation time to 2 h while maintaining high sensitivity and specificity. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) enabled the detection of S-RBD concentrations as low as 132 ng/mL. Both sensors exhibited high specificity, with negligible non-specific interactions observed in the presence of competing proteins. Additionally, the QCM aptasensor’s functionality and stability were verified in biological fluids, indicating its potential for real-world applications. This study highlights the comparative advantages of QCM and electrochemical aptasensors in terms of preparation time, sensitivity, and specificity, offering valuable insights for the development of rapid, sensitive, and specific diagnostic tools for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses.
Funder
Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic and the Slovak Academy of Sciences Slovak Research and Development Agency
Reference42 articles.
1. Zhang, Y., Huang, Z., Zhu, J., Li, C., Fang, Z., Chen, K., and Zhang, Y. (2023). An Updated Review of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Methods in the Context of a Novel Coronavirus Pandemic. Bioeng. Transl. Med., 8. 2. Chavda, V.P., Valu, D.D., Parikh, P.K., Tiwari, N., Chhipa, A.S., Shukla, S., Patel, S.S., Balar, P.C., Paiva-Santos, A.C., and Patravale, V. (2023). Conventional and Novel Diagnostic Tools for the Diagnosis of Emerging SARS-CoV-2 Variants. Vaccines, 11. 3. Solid Supported Lipid Bilayers: From Biophysical Studies to Sensor Design;Castellana;Surf. Sci. Rep.,2006 4. Development of a QCM-Based Biosensor for the Detection of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Biomarkers in Liquid Biopsies;Lino;Talanta,2023 5. Bonyadi, F., Kavruk, M., Ucak, S., Cetin, B., Bayramoglu, G., Dursun, A.D., Arica, Y., and Ozalp, V.C. (2023). Real-Time Biosensing Bacteria and Virus with Quartz Crystal Microbalance: Recent Advances, Opportunities, and Challenges. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem., 1–12.
|
|