Abstract
Socialist realism was more than just a trend in art. It was also, and perhaps predominantly, a method of educating the new post-revolutionary society in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. In socialism, the state became the commissioner, consumer, and critic of art, treating it as a major propaganda tool. It is thus not surprising that the socialist realism patterns were imposed on artists working in those countries which found themselves in the Soviet sphere of influence after the end of the Second World War. In Poland, which was the Soviet Union’s closest neighbour and one of the larger countries in the post-war “Eastern Bloc”, socialist realism was the only permitted creative method in the years 1949–1956. The ideologists of the new art assigned a special role to sculpture, which, next to posters and murals, was considered the most socially accessible form of artistic expression due to the possibility of placing it in public space. Monuments as material carriers of ideology were used as an expression of power, but they also marked the places of strengthening collective identity. During the period of socialist realism in Poland, sculptural activity followed the main three directions: heroic, portrait, and architectural–decorative. Therefore, this paper aims to present theoretical and ideological assumptions relating to socialist sculpture and their confrontation with realisations in Poland during the period of the Soviet artistic doctrine. The paper also presents the aesthetic paradigms of socialist sculptures and their relationships with the canons of European art, and, for Poland, also with the native art, mainly sacral.
Reference67 articles.
1. Artysta, Wobec Zjednoczenia Klasy Robotniczej;Przegląd Artystyczny,1949
2. Скулптура М.А. Менделевича;Искусствo трудящимся,1924
3. Wobec socrealizmu;Baraniewski,1987
4. Ideologia w architekturze Warszawy okresu realizmu socjalistycznego;Baraniewski;Rocznik Historii Sztuki,1996
5. Między opresją a obojętnością. Polsko-rosyjskie relacje architektoniczne w X wieku;Baraniewski,2004