Cramér–Rao Lower Bounds on 3D Position and Orientation Estimation in Distributed Ranging Systems
-
Published:2023-02-03
Issue:3
Volume:13
Page:2008
-
ISSN:2076-3417
-
Container-title:Applied Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Applied Sciences
Author:
Srinivas Sharanya1ORCID, Welker Samuel1, Herschfelt Andrew1, Bliss Daniel W.1
Affiliation:
1. Center for Wireless Information Systems and Computational Architectures (WISCA), Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
Abstract
As radio frequency (RF) hardware continues to improve, many technologies that were traditionally impractical have suddenly become viable alternatives to legacy systems. Two-way ranging (TWR) is often considered a poor positioning solution for airborne and other vehicular navigation systems due to its low precision, poor angular resolution, and precise timing requirements. With the advent of modern RF hardware and advanced processing techniques, however, modern studies have experimentally demonstrated TWR systems with an unprecedented, sub-centimeter ranging precision with low size, weight, power, and cost (SWaP-C) consumer-grade hardware. This technique enables a new class of positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) capabilities for urban and commercial aircraft but also instigates new system design challenges such as antenna placement, installation of new electronics, and design of supporting infrastructure. To inform these aircraft design decisions, we derive 2D and 3D Cramér–Rao lower bounds (CRLBs) on position and orientation estimation in a multi-antenna TWR system. We specifically formulate these bounds as a function of the number of antennas, platform geometry, and geometric dilution of precision (GDoP) to inform aircraft design decisions under different mission requirements. We simulate the performance of several classic position and orientation estimators in this context to validate these bounds and to graphically depict the expected performance with respect to these design considerations. To improve the accessibility of these highly theoretical results, we also present a simplified discussion of how these bounds may be applied to common airborne applications and suggest best practices for using them to inform aircraft design decisions.
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science
Reference60 articles.
1. Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: Survey of recent developments;Haftka;Struct. Optim.,1997 2. Çetin, E., Cano, A., Deransy, R., Tres, S., and Barrado, C. (2022). Implementing mitigations for improving societal acceptance of urban air mobility. Drones, 6. 3. Weisshaar, T.A. (2006). Morphing Aircraft Technology-New Shapes for Aircraft Design, Purdue Univ. 4. Future alternative positioning, navigation, and timing techniques: A survey;Han;IEEE Wirel. Commun.,2016 5. Herschfelt, A., Yu, H., Wu, S., Srinivas, S., Li, Y., Sciammetta, N., Smith, L., Rueger, K., Lee, H., and Chakrabarti, C. (2019, January 8–12). Joint positioning-communications system design and experimental demonstration. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/AIAA 38th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), San Diego, CA, USA.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|