Integrating Proteomic Analysis and Machine Learning to Predict Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness

Author:

Valle Cortés Sheila M.1,Pérez Morales Jaileene2,Nieves Plaza Mariely3,Maldonado Darielys1ORCID,Tevenal Baez Swizel M.1,Negrón Blas Marc A.4,Lazcano Etchebarne Cayetana1ORCID,Feliciano José1,Ruiz Deyá Gilberto5,Santa Rosario Juan C.6ORCID,Santiago Cardona Pedro1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ponce Research Institute, Ponce Health Sciences University, Biochemistry and Cancer Biology Divisions, Ponce, PR 00716, USA

2. Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Oncological Sciences Division, Portland, OR 97239, USA

3. Universidad Central del Caribe, Department of Medicine, Bayamón, PR 00960, USA

4. Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Department of Medicine, Zapopan 45129, Mexico

5. Ponce Research Institute, Ponce Health Sciences University, Surgery Division, Ponce, PR 00716, USA

6. CorePlus Servicios Clínicos y Patológicos, Carolina, PR 00983, USA

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) poses a significant challenge because of the difficulty in identifying aggressive tumors, leading to overtreatment and missed personalized therapies. Although only 8% of cases progress beyond the prostate, the accurate prediction of aggressiveness remains crucial. Thus, this study focused on studying retinoblastoma phosphorylated at Serine 249 (Phospho-Rb S249), N-cadherin, β-catenin, and E-cadherin as biomarkers for identifying aggressive PCa using a logistic regression model and a classification and regression tree (CART). Using immunohistochemistry (IHC), we targeted the expression of these biomarkers in PCa tissues and correlated their expression with clinicopathological data of the tumor. The results showed a negative correlation between E-cadherin and β-catenin with aggressive tumor behavior, whereas Phospho-Rb S249 and N-cadherin positively correlated with increased tumor aggressiveness. Furthermore, patients were stratified based on Gleason scores and E-cadherin staining patterns to evaluate their capability for early identification of aggressive PCa. Our findings suggest that the classification tree is the most effective method for measuring the utility of these biomarkers in clinical practice, incorporating β-catenin, tumor grade, and Gleason grade as relevant determinants for identifying patients with Gleason scores ≥ 4 + 3. This study could potentially benefit patients with aggressive PCa by enabling early disease detection and closer monitoring.

Funder

NIH-NIGMS

Intellectus Foundation

Hispanic Alliance for Clinical and Translational Research

Ponce Health Sciences University—Moffit Cancer Center U54

MAGIC core

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference36 articles.

1. Cancer statistics;Siegel;CA Cancer J. Clin.,2024

2. Brief Overview of Prostate Cancer Statistics, Grading, Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies;Schatten;Cell Mol. Biol. Prostate Cancer,2018

3. National Cancer Institute [NCI] (2024, February 19). SEER Cancer Stat Facts: Prostate Cancer, Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/prost.html.

4. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book;Thompson;Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol.,2012

5. Prostate Cancer Screening;Catalona;Med. Clin. N. Am.,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3