Evaluation of Aortic Valve Pressure Gradients for Increasing Severities of Rheumatic and Calcific Stenosis Using Empirical and Numerical Approaches

Author:

Grobler Lindi1,Laubscher Ryno1,van der Merwe Johan1ORCID,Herbst Philip G.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa

2. Division of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 7505, South Africa

Abstract

The evaluation and accurate diagnosis of the type and severity of aortic stenosis relies on the precision of medical imaging technology and clinical correlations and the expertise of medical professionals. The application of the clinical correlation to different aortic stenosis morphologies and severities is investigated. The manner in which numerical techniques can be used to simulate the blood flow through pathological aortic valves was analysed and compared to the ground-truth CFD model. Larger pressure gradients are estimated in all severities of rheumatic aortic valves compared to calcific aortic valves. The zero-dimensional morphology-insensitive model underpredicted the transvalvular pressure gradient with the greatest error. The 1D model underestimated the pressure gradient in rheumatic cases and overestimated the pressure gradient in calcific cases. The pressure gradients estimated by the clinical approach depends on the location of the flow vena contracta and is sensitive to the severity and type of valve lesion. Through the analysis of entropy generation within the flow domain, the dominant parameters and regions driving adverse pressure gradients were identified. It is concluded that sudden expansion is the dominant parameter leading to higher pressure gradients in rheumatic heart valves compared to calcific ones.

Funder

National Research Foundation of South Africa

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference35 articles.

1. The aortic valve: Structure, complications and implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement;Rozeik;Perfusion,2014

2. Mohrman, D.E., and Heller, L.J. (2018). Cardiovascular Physiology, McGraw-Hill Education. [9th ed.]. Available online: https://accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=2432§ionid=190800315.

3. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease;Vahanian;Eur. Heart J.,2022

4. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease;Otto;J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.,2021

5. Aortic stenosis and non-cardiac surgery;Brown;Contin. Educ. Anaesth. Crit. Care Pain,2005

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3