Revolutionizing Prostate Whole-Slide Image Super-Resolution: A Comparative Journey from Regression to Generative Adversarial Networks
Author:
Gavade Anil B.1ORCID, Gadad Kartik A.1, Gavade Priyanka A.2, Nerli Rajendra B.3, Kanwal Neel4ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of E&C, KLS Gogte Institute of Technology, Belagavi 590008, India 2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, KLE Society’s Dr. M. S. Sheshgiri College of Engineering and Technology, Belagavi 590008, India 3. Department of Urology, JN Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi 590010, India 4. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Stavanger, 4021 Stavanger, Norway
Abstract
Microscopic and digital whole-slide images (WSIs) often suffer from limited spatial resolution, hindering accurate pathological analysis and cancer diagnosis. Improving the spatial resolution of these pathology images is crucial, as it can enhance the visualization of fine cellular and tissue structures, leading to more reliable and precise cancer detection and diagnosis. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative study on super-resolution (SR) reconstruction techniques for prostate WSI, exploring a range of machine learning, deep learning, and generative adversarial network (GAN) algorithms. The algorithms investigated include regression, sparse learning, principal component analysis, bicubic interpolation, multi-support vector neural networks, an SR convolutional neural network, and an autoencoder, along with advanced SRGAN-based methods. The performance of these algorithms was meticulously evaluated using a suite of metrics, such as the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index metrics (SSIMs), root-mean-squared error, mean absolute error and mean structural similarity index metrics (MSSIMs). The comprehensive study was conducted on the SICAPv2 prostate WSI dataset. The results demonstrated that the SRGAN algorithm outperformed other algorithms by achieving the highest PSNR value of 26.47, an SSIM of 0.85, and an MSSIM of 0.92, by 4× magnification of the input LR image, preserving the image quality and fine details. Therefore, the application of SRGAN offers a budget-friendly counter to the high-cost challenge of acquiring high-resolution pathology images, enhancing cancer diagnosis accuracy.
Reference43 articles.
1. Recent Advances in Prostate Cancer (PCa) Diagnostics;Abdelrazek;Uro,2022 2. Sekhoacha, M., Riet, K., Motloung, P., Gumenku, L., Adegoke, A., and Mashele, S. (2022). Prostate cancer review: Genetics, diagnosis, treatment options, and alternative approaches. Molecules, 27. 3. A history of prostate cancer treatment;Denmeade;Nat. Rev. Cancer,2002 4. Prostate Cancer: Advances in Genetic Testing and Clinical Implications;Abdelrazek;Uro,2023 5. Lang, F., Contreras-Gerenas, M.F., Gelléri, M., Neumann, J., Kröger, O., Sadlo, F., Berniak, K., Marx, A., Cremer, C., and Wagenknecht, H.A. (2021). Tackling tumour cell heterogeneity at the super-resolution level in human colorectal cancer tissue. Cancers, 13.
|
|