Perception of Pathologists in Poland of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Medical Diagnosis—A Cross-Sectional Study

Author:

Ahmed Alhassan12ORCID,Brychcy Agnieszka3,Abouzid Mohamed24ORCID,Witt Martin56ORCID,Kaczmarek Elżbieta1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-806 Poznan, Poland

2. Doctoral School, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-806 Poznan, Poland

3. Department of Clinical Patomorphology, Heliodor Swiecicki Clinical Hospital of the Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-806 Poznan, Poland

4. Department of Physical Pharmacy and Pharmacokinetics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznan, Poland

5. Department of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany

6. Department of Anatomy, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany

Abstract

Background: In the past vicennium, several artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models have been developed to assist in medical diagnosis, decision making, and design of treatment protocols. The number of active pathologists in Poland is low, prolonging tumor patients’ diagnosis and treatment journey. Hence, applying AI and ML may aid in this process. Therefore, our study aims to investigate the knowledge of using AI and ML methods in the clinical field in pathologists in Poland. To our knowledge, no similar study has been conducted. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study targeting pathologists in Poland from June to July 2022. The questionnaire included self-reported information on AI or ML knowledge, experience, specialization, personal thoughts, and level of agreement with different aspects of AI and ML in medical diagnosis. Data were analyzed using IBM® SPSS® Statistics v.26, PQStat Software v.1.8.2.238, and RStudio Build 351. Results: Overall, 68 pathologists in Poland participated in our study. Their average age and years of experience were 38.92 ± 8.88 and 12.78 ± 9.48 years, respectively. Approximately 42% used AI or ML methods, which showed a significant difference in the knowledge gap between those who never used it (OR = 17.9, 95% CI = 3.57–89.79, p < 0.001). Additionally, users of AI had higher odds of reporting satisfaction with the speed of AI in the medical diagnosis process (OR = 4.66, 95% CI = 1.05–20.78, p = 0.043). Finally, significant differences (p = 0.003) were observed in determining the liability for legal issues used by AI and ML methods. Conclusion: Most pathologists in this study did not use AI or ML models, highlighting the importance of increasing awareness and educational programs regarding applying AI and ML in medical diagnosis.

Funder

Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3