Driving across Markets: An Analysis of a Human–Machine Interface in Different International Contexts

Author:

Sogemeier Denise12ORCID,Forster Yannick1ORCID,Naujoks Frederik1ORCID,Krems Josef F.2ORCID,Keinath Andreas1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. BMW Group, 80937 Munich, Germany

2. Department of Psychology, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09111 Chemnitz, Germany

Abstract

The design of automotive human–machine interfaces (HMIs) for global consumers’ needs to cater to a broad spectrum of drivers. This paper comprises benchmark studies and explores how users from international markets—Germany, China, and the United States—engage with the same automotive HMI. In real driving scenarios, N = 301 participants (premium vehicle owners) completed several tasks using different interaction modalities. The multi-method approach included both self-report measures to assess preference and satisfaction through well-established questionnaires and observational measures, namely experimenter ratings, to capture interaction performance. We observed a trend towards lower preference ratings in the Chinese sample. Further, interaction performance differed across the user groups, with self-reported preference not consistently aligning with observed performance. This dissociation accentuates the importance of integrating both measures in user studies. By employing benchmark data, we provide insights into varied market-based perspectives on automotive HMIs. The findings highlight the necessity for a nuanced approach to HMI design that considers diverse user preferences and interaction patterns.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference67 articles.

1. Watson, G.H. (1993). Strategic Benchmarking: How to Rate Your Company’s Performance Against the World’s Best, John Wiley & Sons Inc.

2. Evaluating user-computer interaction: A framework;Sweeney;Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud.,1993

3. Integrating quality function deployment and benchmarking to achieve greater profitability;Kumar;BIJ,2006

4. The Importance of Benchmarking for the Management of the Firm: Evaluating the Relation between Total Quality Management and Benchmarking;Erdil;Procedia Comput. Sci.,2019

5. Benchmarking the benchmarking models;Anand;Benchmarking Int. J.,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3