Why Do They Not Do More? Analyzing Peacebuilding Actions of Religious Leaders during and after Violent Conflicts

Author:

Odak Stipe1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Political Science Louvain-Europe, Université catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain la Neuve, Belgium

Abstract

This article examines how religious leaders navigate between tensions involving theological ideals of peace and pragmatic realities during violent conflicts. The findings are based on 75 in-depth interviews with Orthodox, Catholic, and Islamic religious leaders in Bosnia-Herzegovina, conducted between the years 2015 and 2017. The paper introduces the concepts of “theological dissonance” to describe mismatches between principles and actions, and “pastoral optimization” for the strategy of maximizing influence under constraints. Factors influencing engagement in peacebuilding include doctrinal traditions, individual differences, organizational capacity of a religious community, effective control over messaging, and audience receptivity. In terms of practical suggestions, the article proposes several measures that could enhance synergy between religious and nonreligious actors working together in this field, most notably, understanding each other’s scopes and limitations and clarifying what “peace” and “peacebuilding” represent to each partner.

Funder

Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique—FNRS

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference71 articles.

1. A Framework for Nonviolence and Peacebuilding in Islam;Journal of Law and Religion,2000

2. Adorno, Theodor W., Frenkel-Brunswik, Else, Levinson, Daniel J., and Sanford, Nevitt (1950). The Authoritarian Personality, Harper & Brothers.

3. Aho, James Alfred (1981). Religious Mythology and the Art of War: Comparative Religious Symbolisms of Military Violence, Greenwood Press.

4. Appleby, Scott (1999). The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence, and Reconciliation, Rowman & Littlefield.

5. Johnston, Douglas (2003). Faith-Based Diplomacy: Trumping Realpolitik, Oxford University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3