Affiliation:
1. Political Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6139001, Israel
Abstract
This article argues that from the end of the 19thcentury, the debate about anti-Semitism became a marker for a wider dispute focusing on the meaning of national identity. Integrating the Jews into the polity was part, and even a justification, of the Enlightenment political project and of the democratic state. However, while the Jewish question was fundamental for politics and philosophy in the Enlightenment, in our time, as the Enlightenment fades, the Muslim question takes its place. This article argues that the goal of integrating Muslims into the Western democratic polity under a culturally blind, egalitarian and secular type of non-discrimination has proven to be unsuccessful. Moreover, rather than pitting racist nationalists against liberal democrats, it has triggered a “civic confrontation” in liberal political thought, between liberal multiculturalists and supporters of religious freedom who understand, on the one hand, and secular democratic integrationists, on the other.
Reference84 articles.
1. Laïcité: A Paralell French Cultural Policy;Ahearne;French Cultural Studies,2014
2. Al-Rodhan, Nayef R. F. (2012). The Role of the Arab-Islamic World in the Rise of the West: Implications for Contemporary Trans-Cultural Relations, Palgrave Macmillan.
3. Anidjar, Gil (2003). The Jew, the Arab: A History of the Enemy, Stanford University Press.
4. Anthias, Floya, and Yuval-Davis, Nira (1992). Racialized Boundaries Race, Nation, Gender, Colour and Class and the Anti-Racist Struggle, Routledge.
5. Brown, Wendy, Assad, Talal, Butler, Judith, and Mahmood, Saba (2009). Is Critique Secular?: Blasphemy, Injury and Free Speech, The Townsend Center for the Humanities, University of California.