Using Ecological Footprint Analysis to Evaluate Sustainable Development in Lushan County, China
Author:
Yang Huihui12ORCID, Yan Shuiyu2, An Na1ORCID, Yao Qiang1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China 2. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
Abstract
Mountain town ecosystems are fragile and highly susceptible to the impacts of human activities and ecological imbalances. This study aimed to improve the traditional ecological footprint (EF) model by incorporating expanded land functions, localised factors, and temporal continuity. Using Lushan County in Sichuan Province as a case study, we calculated spatial and temporal changes from 2009 to 2022 and evaluated sustainable development through four indicators: ecological pressure, ecological sustainability, ecological occupation, and ecological–economic coordination. The results show that from 2009 to 2022, the per capita ecological carbon footprint in Lushan County decreased by 48%, and the ecological carrying capacity declined by 9%. Despite a more than 73% reduction in the ecological surplus, indicating gradual ecological recovery, Lushan County remains in an ecological deficit state with increasing ecological unsustainability. Only forest land is in an ecological surplus state among the six land use categories, while all other categories are in ecological deficit states. Regarding ecological sustainability assessment, Lushan County’s overall land use is in a strong sustainability state, with the sustainable development index gradually improving. However, ecological–economic coordination remains poor, with a high ecological occupation index and significant ecological pressure, indicating an imbalance between economic development and ecosystem protection. For future sustainable development in mountainous areas, Lushan County should focus on reducing the ecological carbon footprint and enhancing the ecological carrying capacity. These research findings provide valuable insights and methodological references for the sustainable development of mountain towns.
Funder
National key R&D plan “Joint Research and Demonstration for Carbon Reduction Key Technologies in Urban areas and Neighborhoods” Humanities and Social Science Foundation for Ministry of Education, Youth project, China National Natural Science Foundation of China Art Science Planning Foundation of Shanghai, China
Reference58 articles.
1. Borsdorf, A., Stötter, J., Grabherr, G., and Bender, O. (2014). Impacts and Risks of Global Change. Impact of Global Changes on Mountains, CRC Press. 2. Global Mountain Research for Sustainable Development;Jansky;Glob. Environ. Chang.,2002 3. Assessing Tourism Sustainability in Hill Towns: Case Study of Shimla, India;Badar;J. Mt. Sci.,2020 4. Qin, Y., Luo, G., Li, Y., Tan, Q., Zheng, C., Yu, M., Liao, J., and Li, M. (2022). Assessment of Sustainable Development of Rural Settlements in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study of the Miaoling Mountains in Southwestern China. Land, 11. 5. Landscape Evaluation of Rural and Small Towns in Siming Mountain of Zhejiang Based on Landscape Performance;Yang;E3S Web Conf.,2020
|
|