Affiliation:
1. School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
2. Jiangsu Provincial Urban and Rural Digital Technology Engineering Center, Nanjing 210096, China
Abstract
Social equity/inequity and equal/unequal rights to the city extend beyond the distribution of urban parks and green spaces, necessitating research on equitable accessibility to encompass a broader range of public spaces. However, previous research has predominantly focused on green spaces, neglecting other types of public spaces. To address this gap, the present study takes the public space pattern of Nanjing Old City as the research object, employing the minimum distance method, the gravity potential method, and bivariate local Moran’s I to evaluate the matching relationship between the demand of socially vulnerable groups and the supply of public spaces, as well as its temporal–spatial evolution from 2010 to 2020. The results reveal spatial heterogeneity in the accessibility of public spaces for vulnerable groups at the block level, with 28.1% of the total number of blocks and 22.1% of the total area of blocks experiencing a supply–demand imbalance in 2010. From 2010 to 2020, under the rapid urban development, construction of public spaces, and the general decline in population density and proportion of vulnerable populations, the supply–demand imbalance has exacerbated the distribution of public spaces at both individual and aggregate levels. This imbalance is reflected in the deteriorated accessibility of public spaces for vulnerable groups. This study reveals the mismatches between development, population movement, and public space construction in the old city of Nanjing over the past decade, providing decision-making suggestions and foundations for the future optimization of public spaces, thereby offering an effective tool for assessing and improving the accessibility and equitable distribution of public spaces based on the needs of vulnerable groups.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Reference57 articles.
1. Ritchie, H., and Roser, M. Urbanization. Our World in Data, Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/urbanization?ref=the-sustainable-investor.
2. Doğan, H.A., and Sinkiene, J. (2020, January 25–26). Open Public Spaces and Life Quality in Cities. Proceedings of the SPACE International Conference 2020: Architectural Culture and Society, Architecture and Literature and Sustainable Architecture, Planning and Urban Design, London, UK.
3. Carr, S. (1992). Public Space, Cambridge University Press.
4. Integrating green infrastructure, ecosystem services and nature-based solutions for urban sustainability: A comprehensive literature review;Fang;Sustain. Cities Soc.,2023
5. Spatiotemporal patterns and inequity of urban green space accessibility and its relationship with urban spatial expansion in China during rapid urbanization period;Huang;Sci. Total Environ.,2022