Affiliation:
1. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
2. School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
3. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221000, China
4. Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Building Energy Saving and Construction Technology, Xuzhou 221000, China
5. School of Economics and Management, Southwest Petroleum University, Nanchong 637001, China
Abstract
Based on five periods of Landsat remote sensing data from 1980 to 2020, this study constructs a landscape ecological risk-ecosystem service value evaluation model and integrates it with a geodetector model to analyse the environmental benefits of the development of the “production–living–ecological space” pattern and its driving factors in the Xuzhou planning area. The results of the study are as follows: (1) Over the past 40 years, the expansion of living spaces has significantly encroached upon adjacent agricultural production areas and ecological spaces, such as forests and grasslands. Specifically, the areas of agricultural land, forests, and grassland have been diminished by 277.39 km2, 23.8 km2 and 12.93 km2, respectively; in contrast, urban and rural living spaces have increased by 238.62 km2 and 58.92 km2, alongside a rise in industrial production areas, water bodies, and other ecological spaces. (2) Throughout the 40-year period, both the landscape ecological risk (ERI) and ecosystem service value (ESV) in the study area have shown a decreasing trend. The proportion of high- and medium-high-risk areas of the ERI have decreased by 5.19% and 7.50%, respectively, while low, lower, and medium ecological risk areas have increased by 6.40%, 3.22% and 3.07%, respectively. In addition, low-ESV areas have increased by 14.22%, while the proportion of high- and medium-high-ESV areas have decreased by 1.16%. (3) There is a significant positive spatial correlation between the ERI and ESV. Regions with dense ecological spaces comprising forests, water bodies, and grasslands, particularly in the northeastern part of the Jiawang District and the southeastern part of the Tongshan District, demonstrate superior regional ecosystem service quality. The ERI and ESV are dominated by “high–high” and “low–high” aggregation. Conversely, in the southwestern part of the study area, the expansion of living space has led to the transformation of some agricultural land, forest land, and grassland into less risky construction land, resulting in a decline in the quality of regional ecosystem services. The local spatial correlation between the ERI and ESV changed from “high–high”, “low–low”, “low–high” agglomeration to “low–low” agglomeration. (4) Key factors influencing the spatial differentiation of the “production–living–ecological space” include the GDP, population density, soil type, and the distance to towns and roads. Among these, the interaction between population density and soil type has the most significant effect on the changes in the pattern of the “production–living–ecological space”.
Funder
National Key Research and Development Program of the 13th Five-Year Plan: Study on the development mode and technical path of village and town construction
Reference32 articles.
1. Evaluating rural livability in Lishui District of Nanjing under the interaction of Production- Living-Ecological Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions);Xia;Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. (Trans. CSAE),2023
2. Eco-environmental effect of land use/cover change (LUCC) based on integrated ecological space: A case of Yangtze River Delta;Li;Acta Sci. Circumstantiae,2021
3. Li, J.L., Hu, D.W., Wang, Y.Z., Chu, J., Yin, H., and Ma, M. (2024). Study of identification and simulation of ecological zoning through integration of landscape ecological risk and ecosystem service value. Sustain. Cities Soc., 107.
4. Land use transformation based on production-living-ecological functions and associated eco-environmrnt effects: A case study in Yuli County;Wusmanjiang;Arid. Land Geogr.,2021
5. Spatial and temporal evolution of landscape ecological security and its influencing factors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from the perspective of production-living-ecological space in recent 40 years;Zhang;Chin. J. Eco-Agric.,2023