Croatian Combat Athletes’ Attribution Patterns for Their Successes and Failures

Author:

Prosoli Rebeka1,Jelić Margareta2,Barić Renata1,Sisneros Cassandra3,Lochbaum Marc45ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia

2. Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia

3. Center for Transformative Undergraduate Experiences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA

4. Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA

5. Education Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, 4428 Kaunas, Lithuania

Abstract

Successes and failures are integral outcomes to the sport experience. Based on decades of research, how athletes process both outcomes influence their thoughts, emotions, and subsequent achievement endeavors. Attribution theory details three dimensions as to the causes of success and failure. Since the 1980s, attribution theory has found a home in sport psychology literature. However, research across countries requires valid and reliable questionnaires. One such country is Croatia where attribution research is scant. Thus, in a Croatian combat athlete sample, we examined athletes’ attributions for the most and least successful performances via retrospection. Croatian athletes (N = 154) from three combat sports (judo, karate, and taekwondo) who all competed at least once on an international stage completed the Croatian Causal Dimension Scale-II, answered in reference to a specific reason for their best and worst competitive experience. Results showed that the combat sport athletes attributed their most and least successful competitive achievement to psychological reasons more than other reasons (i.e., general preparation and physical preparation). Furthermore, based on a series of two-tailed paired samples t-tests and the nonparametric equivalent, Wilcoxon signed rank test, the participants made, from small to medium in meaningfulness (Cohen’s d), more internal (d = 0.30), stable (d = 0.56), personal (d = 0.30), and external (d = 0.21) controllable attributions for success than for failure (all t-test p-values < 0.01). Our results suggest the athletes made the self-serving attribution bias across both the success and failure competitive events. Our results contribute to better understanding of specific reasons for success and failure and the attribution dimensions explaining the competitive outcomes in competitive combat sport. Specific to Croatian sport, our results provide Croatian combat sport with theory driven research applicable to improving development of Croatian combat athletes on the international stage.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference39 articles.

1. Aronson, E., Wilson, T.D., Akert, R.M., and Sommers, S.R. (2015). Social Psychology, Pearson Education. [9th ed.].

2. A systematic review of content themes in sport attribution research:1954–2011;Allen;Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol.,2012

3. Attribution in sport psychology: Seeking congruence between theory, research and practice;Rees;Psychol. Sport Exerc.,2005

4. Motivation and perceptions of control: Tracing its development and plotting its future in exercise and sport psychology;Biddle;J. Sport Exerc. Psychol.,1999

5. Causal attribution and emotion in the days following competition;Allen;J. Sport. Sci.,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3