Constructing Semantic Summaries Using Embeddings
-
Published:2024-04-20
Issue:4
Volume:15
Page:238
-
ISSN:2078-2489
-
Container-title:Information
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Information
Author:
Trouli Georgia Eirini1, Papadakis Nikos1, Kondylakis Haridimos23ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University (HMU), 71309 Heraklion, Greece 2. Computer Science Department, University of Crete, 70013 Heraklion, Greece 3. Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece
Abstract
The increase in the size and complexity of large knowledge graphs now available online has resulted in the emergence of many approaches focusing on enabling the quick exploration of the content of those data sources. Structural non-quotient semantic summaries have been proposed in this direction that involve first selecting the most important nodes and then linking them, trying to extract the most useful subgraph out of the original graph. However, the current state of the art systems use costly centrality measures for identifying the most important nodes, whereas even costlier procedures have been devised for linking the selected nodes. In this paper, we address both those deficiencies by first exploiting embeddings for node selection, and then by meticulously selecting approximate algorithms for node linking. Experiments performed over two real-world big KGs demonstrate that the summaries constructed using our method enjoy better quality. Specifically, the coverage scores obtained were 0.8, 0.81, and 0.81 for DBpedia v3.9 and 0.94 for Wikidata dump 2018, across 20%, 25%, and 30% summary sizes, respectively. Additionally, our method can compute orders of magnitude faster than the state of the art.
Reference28 articles.
1. Summarizing semantic graphs: A survey;Kondylakis;VLDB J.,2019 2. Pappas, A., Troullinou, G., Roussakis, G., Kondylakis, H., and Plexousakis, D. (June, January 28). Exploring importance measures for summarizing RDF/S KBs. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference, ESWC 2017, Portorož, Slovenia. 3. Peroni, S., Motta, E., and d’Aquin, M. (2008, January 8–11). Identifying key concepts in an ontology, through the integration of cognitive principles with statistical and topological measures. Proceedings of the 3rd Asian Semantic Web Conference, ASWC 2008, Bangkok, Thailand. 4. Trouli, G.E., Troullinou, G., Koumakis, L., Papadakis, N., and Kondylakis, H. (2021, January 24–28). SumMER: Summarizing RDF/S KBs using machine learning. Proceedings of the ISWC 2021: Posters, Demos and Industry Tracks, Virtual Conference. 5. Trouli, G.E., Pappas, A., Troullinou, G., Koumakis, L., Papadakis, N., and Kondylakis, H. (2023). SumMER: Structural summarization for RDF/S KGs. Algorithms, 16.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|