Affiliation:
1. DL E&C, Nepal UT1 HEPP Project Team, Seoul 03181, Republic of Korea
2. Department of Safety Engineering, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Republic of Korea
Abstract
The optimal size of a diversion structure should be carefully studied to ensure economic viability and safety during construction. In practice, to determine the size of a diversion structure, design flood frequency is selected as the suggested return period presented by the design standard, which is presented differently. This study proposes a methodology for the design of a diversion structure with a concrete cofferdam adopting risk analysis to reflect the more practical hazard and risk of diversion structure during dam construction. The proposed methodology is based on a risk-based least-cost design process and risk analysis. The optimization result is presented as the lowest expected monetary value, which accounts for construction cost, reconstruction cost, and delay liquidated damage with the failure probability and recovery cost with the overflow probability. This methodology was applied to the case study of the Gulpur hydropower project in Pakistan. The results showed that the optimal design flood frequency is 1 year for a recovery cost of USD 0.5 mil. and 1~2 years for a recovery cost of USD 1.0~2.0 mil. with 3, 4, and 5 years of the usage period of the diversion structure. Furthermore, 2~10 years is the optimal value for a recovery cost of USD 3.0~4.0 mil. These results indicated that the optimal design flood frequency increases as the recovery cost and usage period of the diversion structure increase. The results of the study reveal that the recovery cost and the period of use of the diversion structure affect the design flood frequency of the diversion structure. From a design perspective, the period of use is determined by the construction period of the project or the construction method, whereas the recovery cost depends on the countermeasure method. Therefore, after preparing a proactive plan and estimating the recovery cost, the design flood frequency for the diversion structure should be determined.
Funder
a Incheon National University Research
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science
Reference12 articles.
1. (1986). Bulletin 48a: River Control during Dam Construction, ICOLD (International Commission on Large Dams).
2. (2011). Dam Design Standard, KWRA (Korea Water Resources Association).
3. Tung, T.K., Yen, B.C., and Melching, C.S. (2006). Hydrosystems Engineering Reliability Assessments and Risk Analysis, McGraw-Hill.
4. Risk-based optimization of large flood-diversion systems using genetic algorithms;Afshar;J. Eng. Optim.,2009
5. Risk-Cost Optimization of Hydraulic Structures: Methodology and Case Study;Rasekh;J. Water Resour. Manag.,2010
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献