Affiliation:
1. Institute of Modern Chinese Thought and Culture, Philosophy Department, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
2. Ma Yifu Humanistic Research Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
Abstract
As cultures become increasingly involved, attempts are made to find productive lines along which ethical understandings can be developed which respect diversity and yet go beyond simplistic comparisons. Much of the discussion in this area is squarely situated within existing religious or philosophical frameworks—and these, in turn, are in the aggregate decidedly based on Western traditions. This paper proposes a philosophical-religious reading of Confucianism, especially with respect to its appreciation of ethical responsibility based on the importance of community, tradition, and norms, as a foundation for developing post comparative ethical approaches. The majority of the paper is centered on reading of responsibility in early Confucian texts which challenges the assumptions of contemporary academic philosophy (as practiced in classrooms, journals, and conferences) and fits into a decidedly Chinese way of thinking about religion that can be used to go beyond simplistic comparisons. This offers, in terms of both the approach being used and the specific content, an avenue for constructing post-comparative understandings of ethics.
Reference17 articles.
1. Brown, Joshua, and McLeod, Alexus (2020). Transcendence and Non-Naturalism in Early Chinese Thought, Bloomsbury Academic.
2. Chen, Lai (2014). Renxue Bentilun 仁學本體論 [The Ontology of Ren], SDX Join Publishing Company 三聯書店.
3. Mutuality and Autonomy in Morality and Relgiousness: China and West;Cheng;Journal of Chinese Philosophy,2014
4. Ferrero, Michele (2024). The First Latin Translation of Li 礼 from the Analects of Confucius: Roman Virtues or Religious Acts?. Religions, 15.
5. Hsia, R. Po-Chia (2010). A Jesuit in the Forbidden City: Matteo Ricci, 1552–1610, Oxford University Press.