Affiliation:
1. School of Environment & Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4222, Australia
Abstract
Proliferation of CSR quality certification programs can be analysed within theories of mimicry. Some firms use third-party quality certificates to signal their CSR practices to consumers accurately. These firms and consumers benefit from few, simple, recognized, reliable labels. Other firms use competing or own-brand labels to signal deceptively, gaining competitive advantage without compliance costs. Unreliable labels act as mimics to dupe consumers. If consumers cannot determine which labels are misleading, they ignore them all. Within ecological theories of mimicry, this is known as aggressive reverse Brouwerian automimicry. CSR-label research has a different naming tradition, and this sector-scale effect could be called a rotkäppchen effect, analogous to program-scale groucho and firm-scale goldilocks effects. It is testable by analysing mimicry mechanisms or predicted patterns.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference91 articles.
1. From spectrum to multiverse: A new perspective on the diversity of quality control tools for sustainable tourism theory and practice;Lesar;J. Travel Res.,2019
2. Eco-labels, conspicuous conservation and moral licensing: An indirect behavioural rebound effect;Barkemeyer;Ecol. Econ.,2023
3. Panopoulos, A., Poulis, A., Theodoridis, P., and Kalampakas, A. (2023). Influencing green purchase intention through eco labels and user-generated content. Sustainability, 15.
4. Green, greener, greenest: Ecolabel gradation and competition;Li;J. Environ. Econ. Manag.,2015
5. How does eco-label competition affect environmental benefits? The case of Central Africa’s forests;Doremus;J. Environ. Econ. Manag.,2020
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献