Perceived Social Impacts of Protected Areas, Their Influence on Local Public Support and Their Distribution across Social Groups: Evidence from the Eifel National Park, Germany, during the COVID-19 Pandemic
-
Published:2023-07-11
Issue:14
Volume:15
Page:10848
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
McGinlay James1, Holtvoeth Jens2ORCID, Begley Alfie1, Dörstel Juliana3, Kockelmann Anne3, Lammertz Michael3, Malesios Chrysovalantis1, Jones Nikoleta1
Affiliation:
1. Institute for Global Sustainable Development, The Ramphal Building, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK 2. School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough TS1 3BX, UK 3. Eifel National Park Administration, Urftseestraße 34, 53937 Schleiden, Germany
Abstract
Protected Areas are a cornerstone of biodiversity conservation policies, providing significant benefits both for nature and people. This study investigates the diversity, extent, and social and spatial distribution of the social outcomes of the Eifel National Park in Germany and how these are linked with the level of public support for the park, as well as the effect of COVID-19 on these social impacts. Structured questionnaires were distributed to local residents living inside or near the national park. According to our study the national park is rated positively by the majority of respondents, and provides a range of benefits, but also costs, to local communities. There are also variations in how these impacts are distributed across different sub-communities, between residents and visitors, and across geographical locations in and around the park, and there is a significant relationship between local people’s perceptions of some social impacts and their level of support for the national park’s existence. Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic suggests that, whilst living in close proximity to the park enhances the quality of life of local residents, any future increases in tourism may need careful planning and management if they are not to erode local people’s quality of life.
Funder
European Research Council
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference72 articles.
1. (2023, May 24). Data Visualisation: Nationally Designated Areas by Country and International Union for Conservation of Nature Management Category for Major Ecosystem Types’, European Environment Agency. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/daviz/nationally-designated-areas-by-iucn#tab-chart_4_filters=%7B%22rowFilters%22%3A%7B%7D%3B%22columnFilters%22%3A%7B%22pre_config_major_ecosystem_type%22%3A%5B%22Terrestrial%20ecosystem%22%5D%7D%7D. 2. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values;Chan;Ecol. Econ.,2012 3. Does nature conservation enhance ecosystem services delivery?;Eastwood;Ecosyst. Serv.,2016 4. Evaluating the impacts of protected areas on human wellbeing across the developing world;Naidoo;Sci. Adv.,2019 5. Balmford, A., Green, J.M., Anderson, M., Beresford, J., Huang, C., Naidoo, R., Walpole, M., and Manica, A. (2015). Walk on the Wild Side: Estimating the Global Magnitude of Visits to Protected Areas. PLoS Biol., 13.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|