Affiliation:
1. Department of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Texas A&M University-San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78224, USA
Abstract
Theories of holistic face processing vary widely with respect to conceptualizations, paradigms, and stimuli. These divergences have left several theoretical questions unresolved. Namely, the role of attention in face perception is understudied. To rectify this gap in the literature, we combined the complete composite face task (allowing for predictions of multiple theoretical conceptualizations and connecting with a large body of research) with a secondary auditory discrimination task at encoding (to avoid a visual perceptual bottleneck). Participants studied upright, intact faces within a continuous recognition paradigm, which intermixes study and test trials at multiple retention intervals. Within subjects, participants studied faces under full or divided attention. Test faces varied with respect to alignment, congruence, and retention intervals. Overall, we observed the predicted beneficial outcomes of holistic processing (e.g., higher discriminability for Congruent, Aligned faces relative to Congruent, Misaligned faces) that persisted across retention intervals and attention. However, we did not observe the predicted detrimental outcomes of holistic processing (e.g., higher discriminability for Incongruent, Misaligned faces relative to Incongruent, Aligned faces). Because the continuous recognition paradigm exerts particularly strong demands on attention, we interpret these findings through the lens of resource dependency and domain specificity.
Subject
Cell Biology,Cognitive Neuroscience,Sensory Systems,Optometry,Ophthalmology
Reference48 articles.
1. Local discriminability determines the strength of holistic processing for faces in the fusiform face area;Goffaux;Front. Psychol.,2013
2. Holistic perception of individual faces in the right middle fusiform gyrus as evidenced by the composite face illusion;Schiltz;J. Vis.,2010
3. Peterson, M., and Rhodes, G. (2003). Analytic and Holistic Processes in the Perception of Faces, Objects, and Scenes, Oxford University Press.
4. Features are also important: Contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition;Cabeza;Psychol. Sci.,2000
5. The perception of a face is no more than the sum of its parts;Gold;Psychol. Sci.,2012