Influence of Clay Content on CO2-Rock Interaction and Mineral-Trapping Capacity of Sandstone Reservoirs
Author:
Al-Khdheeawi Emad A.12ORCID, Mahdi Doaa Saleh2, Yuan Yujie134, Iglauer Stefan4
Affiliation:
1. Western Australian School of Mines: Minerals, Energy and Chemical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia 2. Oil and Gas Engineering Department, University of Technology-Iraq, Baghdad 10066, Iraq 3. School of Earth Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China 4. School of Engineering, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
Abstract
The injection of carbon dioxide (CO2) is an essential technology for maximizing the potential of hydrocarbon reservoirs while reducing the impact of greenhouse gases. However, because of the complexity of this injection, there will be many different chemical reactions between the formation fluids and the rock minerals. This is related to the clay content of sandstone reservoirs, which are key storage targets. Clay content and clay types in sandstone can vary substantially, and the influence of these factors on reservoir-scale CO2-water-sandstone interactions has not been managed appropriately. Consequently, by simulating the process of CO2 injection in two different clay-content sandstones (i.e., high- and low-clay content), we investigated the effect of the sandstone clay concentration on CO2-water-sandstone interactions in this article. High clay content (Bandera Grey sandstone) and low clay content (Bandera Brown sandstone) were considered as potential storage reservoirs and their responses to CO2 injection were computationally assessed. Our results indicate that the mineralogical composition of the sandstone reservoir significantly varies as a result of CO2-water-sandstone interactions. Clearly, the high clay-content sandstone (Bandera Grey) had a higher maximum CO2 mineral-trapping capacity (6 kg CO2/m3 sandstone) than Bandera Brown Sandstone (low clay content), which had only 3.3 kg CO2/m3 sandstone mineral-storage capacity after 400 years of storage. Interestingly, pH was decreased by ~3 in Bandera Grey sandstone and by ~2.5 in Bandera Brown sandstone. Furthermore, porosity increased in Bandera Grey sandstone (by +5.6%), more than in Bandera Brown Sandstone (+4.4%) after a 400-year storage period. Overall, we concluded that high clay-content sandstone shows more potential for CO2 mineral-trapping.
Subject
Energy (miscellaneous),Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Optimization,Engineering (miscellaneous),Building and Construction
Reference53 articles.
1. Carbon geosequestration in limestone: Pore-scale dissolution and geomechanical weakening;Lebedev;Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control,2017 2. Nanoscale geomechanical properties of Western Australian coal;Yu;J. Pet. Sci. Eng.,2017 3. Metz, B., Davidson, O., De Coninck, H.C., Loos, M., and Meyer, L. (2005). IPCC, 2005: IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press. 4. CO2 storage in a depleted gas field: An overview of the CO2CRC Otway Project and initial results;Underschultz;Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control,2011 5. Zhao, Y., Wu, S., Chen, Y., Yu, C., Yu, Z., Hua, G., Guan, M., Lin, M., and Yu, X. (2022). CO2-Water-Rock Interaction and Pore Structure Evolution of the Tight Sandstones of the Quantou Formation, Songliao Basin. Energies, 15.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|