Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Informatics, University of Miskolc, Egyetemváros, H-3515 Miskolc, Hungary
Abstract
Industrial robots have a key role in the concept of Industry 4.0. On the one hand, these systems improve quality and productivity, but on the other hand, they require a huge amount of energy. Energy saving solutions have to be developed and applied to provide sustainable production. The purpose of this research is to develop the optimal control strategy for industrial robots in order to minimize energy consumption. Therefore, a case study was conducted for the development of two control strategies to be applied to the RV-2AJ Mitsubishi robot arm with 5 DOF, where the system is a nonlinear one. The first examined controller is the classical linear proportional integral derivative (PID) controller, while the second one is the linear model predictive control (MPC) controller. In our study, the performances of both the classical PID model and the linear MPC controller were compared. As a result, it was found that the MPC controller in the execution of the three defined reference trajectories [(1) curve motion, (2) N-shaped motion, and (3) circle motion] was always faster and required less energy consumption, whereas in terms of precision the PID succeeded in executing the trajectory more precisely than the MPC but with higher energy consumption. The main contribution of the research is that the performances of the two control strategies with regard to a complex dynamic system were compared in the case of the execution of three different trajectories. The evaluations show that the MPC controller is, on the one hand, more energy efficient; on the other hand, it provides a shorter cycle time compared to the PID controller.
Subject
Energy (miscellaneous),Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Optimization,Engineering (miscellaneous),Building and Construction
Reference61 articles.
1. Catalyst processing and recycling;Kovalcik;Acta Tecnol.,2021
2. Shi, W., Wang, K., Zhao, C., and Tian, M. (2022). Obstacle avoidance path planning for the dual-arm robot based on an improved RRT algorithm. Appl. Sci., 12.
3. Efficient path planning of soft robotic arms in the presence of obstacles;Fairchild;IFAC-Pap.,2021
4. Trajectory planning for reconfigurable industrial robots designed to operate in a high precision manufacturing industry;Avram;Procedia CIRP,2016
5. Evaluation criteria for trajectories of robotic arms;Moreira;Robotics,2022
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献