Abstract
Wastewater treatment plants play a critical role in reducing point source pollution in watersheds; however, in taking on the task of reducing pollutants such as COD and NH3-N, they also consume energy intensively, which can result in additional greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and operating (OAM) costs. Therefore, appropriate effluent targets should be implemented to achieve a balance between pollution load reduction, greenhouse gas emissions and operating costs, depending on the field conditions of the wastewater plant. In this study, four different wastewater treatment technologies, namely, A2/O, CASS, MBR and A/O-MBR, which are mainly operated in the Liaohe River Basin of Jilin Province, were selected using the coupled AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS models, and the appropriate effluent standards were preferred according to the characteristics of these technologies. Firstly, the AHP model is used to determine the criteria layer (environmental, economic and social benefits) of the four treatment technologies and the weights of each indicator, and then the fuzzy TOPSIS model is used to determine the indicator values of the different alternatives (effluent standards) of the four treatment technologies, and finally the optimal value of the effluent standard is determined, in terms of COD, 30 mg/L for A2/O and CASS process and 50 mg/L for MBR and A/O-MBR.
Funder
Major Science and Technology Project, Science and Technology Department of Jilin Province
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference37 articles.
1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2011). Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report: Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2009.
2. Assessment of greenhouse gas emission from A/O and SBR wastewater treatment plants in Beijing, China;Bao;Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad.,2016
3. Greenhouse gas emission quantification from wastewater treatment plants, using a tracer gas dispersion method;Delre;Sci. Total Environ.,2017
4. Emission of greenhouse gas from livestock waste and wastewater treatment in Taiwan;Su;Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.,2003
5. Brannon, E.Q. (2017). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Biological Nutrient Removal During Wastewater Treatment, University of Rhode Island.