Assessment of Bacterial Load and Post-Endodontic Pain after One-Visit Root Canal Treatment Using Two Types of Endodontic Access Openings: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Author:

Al-Ani Ahmed M.1,Ali Ahmed H.1ORCID,Koller Garrit234ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Aesthetic and Restorative Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 10071, Iraq

2. Conservative and MI Dentistry (Including Endodontics), King’s College London Dental Institute at Guy’s Hospital, King’s Health Partners, London SE1 9RT, UK

3. Centre for Oral, Clinical and Translational Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK

4. London Centre for Nanotechnology, London WC1H 0AH, UK

Abstract

The need for controlling bacteria and pain during root canal therapy is undeniable. This clinical trial aimed to assess whether there is a difference in colony-forming unit (CFU) reduction after instrumentation and post-endodontic pain after root canal treatment (RCT) using a traditional endodontic cavity (TEC) versus a conservative endodontic cavity (CEC). This clinical study was conducted on 89 patients designated for a single-visit RCT. Patients were allocated randomly (TEC n = 45 and CEC n = 44). The access opening was gained accordingly in each group by a single operator. A pre-instrumentation sample of root canal dentin was collected using an endodontic file; the second sample was collected similarly, right after shaping and cleaning the root canal. The CFU was calculated based on the samples collected. The pain level was recorded preoperatively and at 1, 7, and 21 days postoperatively utilizing a visual analog scale (VAS). There were no statistically significant differences in the CFU reduction between the TEC and CEC groups (p > 0.05). Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences found in postoperative pain levels between the TEC and CEC at 1, 7, and 21 days (p > 0.05). Despite the limitations of this study, both the CEC and TEC demonstrate a decrease in bacteria within the root canals and alleviate postoperative pain with no difference between them.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference57 articles.

1. Hargreaves, K.M., Berman, L.H., and Rotstein, I. (2016). Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp, Elsevier. [11th ed.].

2. European Society of Endodontology (2006). Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: Consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int. Endod. J., 39, 921–930.

3. Continuous Chelation Concept in Endodontics;Adham;J. Bagh. Coll. Dent.,2022

4. Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with different access cavity designs;Plotino;J. Endod.,2017

5. Reciprocation and rotation nickel-titanium file systems’ cyclic fatigue and centering ability in premolars accessed by ultraconservative and traditional access cavities: An in vitro study;Aldury;Saudi Endod. J.,2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3