Abstract
Inequality is a problem facing the world community, especially in developing countries, that affects urban transport and vice versa. Which possible urban transportation mode will cause the least inequality? This is a vital question. The development of Autonomous vehicles (AV) has made Shared Autonomous Vehicles (SAV) one of the future transport modes. Active and public transport are also mentioned as applicable future modes, based on the literature. This paper aims to compare inequality in active transportation, public transport and SAV as the most important alternatives to private cars in the future. In this regard, we use doughnut economic concepts as the framework for our comparison. First, the inequality concept is expanded and then literature demonstrates the future desirability of modes. We show why doughnut economics could be a beneficial alternative for comparing that resulted in the superiority of active and public transport over SAV in terms of future inequality.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference235 articles.
1. A history of the concept of sustainable development: Literature review;Ann. Univ. Oradea Econ. Sci. Ser.,2008
2. Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review;Cogent Soc. Sci.,2019
3. Nations, U. (2019). World Urbanization Prospects 2018, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
4. Urban-rural gaps in the developing world: Does internal migration offer opportunities?;J. Econ. Perspect.,2020
5. The impact of internal migration on population redistribution: An international comparison;Popul. Space Place,2017
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献