Adoption of Local Peer-to-Peer Energy Markets: Technical and Economical Perspectives for Utilities

Author:

Küster Kristie Kaminski12,Gebbran Daniel3ORCID,Aoki Alexandre Rasi2,Lambert-Torres Germano4ORCID,Navarro-Gevers Daniel5,Impinisi Patrício Rodolfo1,Pinto Cleverson Luiz da Silva6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba 81531-990, Brazil

2. Lactec Institute, Curitiba 80215-090, Brazil

3. Equilibrium Energy, Boston, MA 02116, USA

4. Gnarus Institute, Itajuba 37500-052, Brazil

5. Institute of New Energy Systems (InES), Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt, 85049 Ingolstadt, Germany

6. Companhia Paranaense de Energia, Curitiba 81200-240, Brazil

Abstract

Peer-to-peer (P2P) energy markets constitute a promising approach for locally coordinating the increasing amount of distributed energy resources (DERs) in the distribution system. Although the benefits of P2P markets for the prosumers are already well understood, their impact on utilities is not well discussed nor well understood. This hinders the development of regulatory frameworks, which are still needed to allow for the widespread adoption of decentralized energy markets in any interested country. So far, research has been conducted in specific isolated aspects, making it difficult to understand the overall implications for utilities. The present study aims to tackle this research gap by comprehensively evaluating P2P markets’ effects, considering utilities as primary stakeholders. A qualitative roadmap with the overall benefits and challenges of adopting P2P by utilities is outlined to reach this purpose. Technical and economic criteria are assigned for comparing a P2P market to the current regulatory framework. Each criterion is evaluated in a co-simulation platform connecting a market model to a power flow model. Market performance is assessed by revenue analysis, and grid operation indicators evaluate grid performance. Furthermore, network fees are introduced as compensation mechanisms for the net revenue loss. Comparison scenarios encompass network fees and the number of agents, PV, and storage penetration. Results demonstrate that there is no possible benefit for both utilities and prosumers simultaneously if looking exclusively at the financial balance of the market. An equilibrium in benefits for all stakeholders is achievable if non-financial metrics are considered in an integrated market and fee structure analysis. Moreover, results demonstrate that the design of market structures must be sensitive to network configurations and DER penetration changes. This study contributes toward comprehending how the utilities could embrace P2P markets as a feasible solution for grid coordination challenges, opening a new set of questions for further research.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Energy (miscellaneous),Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Optimization,Engineering (miscellaneous),Building and Construction

Reference33 articles.

1. Using peer-to-peer energy-trading platforms to incentivize prosumers to form federated power plants;Morstyn;Nat. Energy,2018

2. GWAC (2013). GridWise Transactive Energy Framework Draft Version. GridWise Archit. Counc. Trans. Energy, 1, 1–23. Available online: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1123244.

3. Transaction-based operation of electric distribution systems: A review;Aoki;Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst.,2019

4. Electricity market design for the prosumer era;Parag;Nat. Energy,2016

5. The Emergence of Consumer-centric Electricity Markets;Pinson;Distrib. Util.,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3