Affiliation:
1. GreenUPorto-Sustainable Agrifood Production Research Centre & Inov4Agro, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre s/n, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
2. Biology Department, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre s/n, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
Abstract
Agricultural soil degradation is occurring at unprecedented rates, not only as an indirect effect of climate change (CC) but also due to intensified agricultural practices which affect soil properties and biodiversity. Therefore, understanding the impacts of CC and soil degradation on plant physiology is crucial for the sustainable development of mitigation strategies to prevent crop productivity losses. The amino acid proline has long been recognized for playing distinct roles in plant cells undergoing osmotic stress. Due to its osmoprotectant and redox-buffering ability, a positive correlation between proline accumulation and plants’ tolerance to abiotic stress has been pointed out in numerous reviews. Indeed, proline quantification is used systematically by plant physiologists as an indicator of the degree of tolerance and a measurement of the antioxidant potential in plants under stressful conditions. Moreover, the exogenous application of proline has been shown to increase resilience to several stress factors, including those related to soil degradation such as salinity and exposure to metals and xenobiotics. However, recent data from several studies often refer to proline accumulation as a signal of stress sensitivity with no clear correlation with improved antioxidant activity or higher stress tolerance, including when proline is used exogenously as a stress reliever. Nevertheless, endogenous proline levels are strongly modified by these stresses, proving its involvement in plant responses. Hence, one main question arises—is proline augmentation always a sign of improved stress resilience? From this perspective, the present review aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the implications of proline accumulation in plants under abiotic stress induced by soil degradation factors, reinforcing the idea that proline quantification should not be employed as a sole indicator of stress sensitivity or resilience but rather complemented with further biochemical and physiological endpoints.
Funder
Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia
Fundação La Caixa/BPI
FCT/MCTES
Subject
Cell Biology,Clinical Biochemistry,Molecular Biology,Biochemistry,Physiology
Reference218 articles.
1. Cultivars to Face Climate Change Effects on Crops and Weeds: A Review;Korres;Agron. Sustain. Dev.,2016
2. Examining Plant Physiological Responses to Climate Change through an Evolutionary Lens;Becklin;Plant Physiol.,2016
3. FAO (2017). FAO Strategy on Climate Change, FAO.
4. FAO (2018, January 2–14). FAO’s Work on Climate Change. Proceedings of the United Nations Climate Change Conference 2018, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Katowice, Poland.
5. Arable Lands under the Pressure of Multiple Land Degradation Processes. A Global Perspective;Patriche;Environ. Res.,2021
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献