The Quest for Industrially and Environmentally Efficient Nanobubble Engineering: Electric-Field versus Mechanical Generation Approaches

Abstract

Nanobubbles (NBs) are gaseous domains at the nanoscale that can exist in bulk liquid or on solid surfaces. They are noteworthy for their high potential for real-world applications and their long (meta)stability. “Platform-wide” applications abound in medicine, wastewater treatment, hetero-coagulation, boundary-slip control in microfluidics, and nanoscopic cleaning. Here, we compare and contrast the industrial NB-generation performance of various types of commercial NB generators in both water-flow and submerged-in-water settings—in essence, comparing electric-field NB-generation approaches versus mechanical ones—finding that the former embodiments are superior from a variety of perspectives. It was found that the electric-field approach for NB generation surpasses traditional mechanical approaches for clean-water NB generation, especially when considering the energy running cost. In particular, more passive electric-field approaches are very operationally attractive for NB generation, where water and gas flow can be handled at little to no cost to the end operator, and/or submersible NB generators can be deployed, allowing for the use of photovoltaic approaches (with backup batteries for night-time and “low-sun” scenarios and air-/CO2-pumping paraphernalia).